Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Forensic urology: a practical vision

S Boyarsky1

  • 1St. Louis University School of Medicine, Missouri 63108, USA.

Medicine and Law
|July 1, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Urologists have a legal duty to serve as expert witnesses. Enhancing forensic education and developing a Forensic Urology subspecialty are crucial for improving the quality of expert testimony in legal proceedings.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Formative years of the Urodynamics Society: reminiscences.

Neurourology and urodynamics·1998
Same author

Testicular torsion: pitfalls of color Doppler sonography.

The Journal of urology·1993
Same author

Thanatology: a new clinical specialty to help confront death.

Missouri medicine·1992
Same author

"Let's kill all the lawyers": what did Shakespeare mean?

The Journal of legal medicine·1991
Same author

Medicolegal aspects of testicular torsion.

Missouri medicine·1990
Same author

Can a urologic nurse contribute to management of secondary impotence in an office setting?

Urology·1990
Same journal

CRIMINAL CONDUCT DUE TO DRUNKENNESS: CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BRAZILIAN TRAFFIC LEGISLATION.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

TRANSDISCIPLINARITY IN STRATEGIC DECISIONS FOR ONCOLOGICAL TREATMENTS.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

LAWS RELATED TO THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN'S HEALTH IN JAPAN.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

ANTICIPATED DIRECTIVES OF WILL, ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE, HEALTH CARE ATTORNEY: AN ISSUE OF SELF-DETERMINATION.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

HEALTH LAW AND ELDERLY PERSONS.

Medicine and law·2019
Same journal

IS A 'NO FAULT' COMPENSATION SCHEME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEMS OF TORT IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE?

Medicine and law·2019
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Urology
  • Legal Medicine
  • Medical Professionalism

Background:

  • Urologists are legally obligated to act as expert witnesses.
  • There is a significant gap in forensic education for urologists.
  • Current training inadequately prepares urologists for their legal roles.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the neglected area of forensic education in urology.
  • To define the necessary competencies for urologists serving as expert witnesses.
  • To propose practical solutions for improving forensic expertise in urology.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the legal duties of urologists as expert witnesses.
  • Analysis of the deficiencies in current forensic education.
  • Description of practical measures based on over a decade of experience.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Recommendation for the formal development of a Forensic Urology subspecialty.

    • Main Results:

    • Forensic competence, alongside clinical skills, is essential for expert witnesses.
    • Urologists require knowledge of legal concepts, terminology, and the expert's role.
    • The primary role of an expert witness is to inform, not persuade, the court.
    • Practical strategies and formal subspecialty development are needed.

    Conclusions:

    • Formalizing Forensic Urology as a subspecialty is recommended.
    • Colleges and professional societies should sponsor this development.
    • Improved forensic education will enhance the quality of expert witness testimony.
    • Urologists must be equipped with both clinical and forensic expertise.