Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2026

Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
Published on: October 12, 2012
Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and during percutaneous coronary
Dean J Kereiakes1, Gilles Montalescot, Elliott M Antman
1Lindner Center for Research and Education and The Ohio Heart Health Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA. lindner@fuse.net
Insights
Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) can be safely used in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) patients undergoing cardiac procedures. Combining LMWH with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors does not increase major bleeding risk, offering new therapeutic algorithms.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) benefit from low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
- Lack of clear guidelines for LMWH use in ACS, especially during transition to intervention and with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.
Framework:
- An international task force formulated consensus recommendations for LMWH use in non-ST-elevation ACS.
- Recommendations based on evidence from randomized trials, observational studies, and expert consensus.
Implementation:
- LMWH is safe for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Transition from medical management to interventional procedures is facilitated by upstream LMWH use.
Implications:
- LMWH and GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists can be safely combined without increasing major bleeding.
- Consensus algorithms are provided for seamless integration of LMWH therapy in ACS management.
Background:
Therapy with either low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists is of benefit to patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). However, algorithms that define how LMWH may be used in patients, proceeding from medical management to intervention and in conjunction with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, are lacking. The objectives of this task force were to formulate recommendations based on all available data for the use of LMWH, both with and without GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, and to provide seamless integration of care during the transition from medical to interventional management.
Methods And Results:
An international task force of 14 cardiologists with extensive experience in clinical trials was convened in New York in February 2001 to address issues related to the use of LMWH in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS. Evidence from randomized trials, observational studies, and other reports was discussed, and consensus recommendations were formulated.
Conclusions:
Substantial evidence exists that patients receiving LMWH for an ACS can safely undergo cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention. Concerns regarding the transition of these patients from the medical service to the cardiac catheterization laboratory should therefore not impede the upstream use of LMWH. Furthermore, LMWH and GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists can be used safely in combination, with no apparent increase in the risk of major bleeding. Consensus algorithms for therapy are presented.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
