Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Levels of processing: past, present. and future?

Fergus I M Craik1

  • 1Rotman Research Institute of Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Canada. craik@psych.utoronto.ca

Memory (Hove, England)
|October 25, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Larry Jacoby's research on aging and memory: Review and commentary.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Endel Tulving: An appreciation of his scientific contributions.

Neuropsychologia·2025
Same author

The interactive effects of divided attention and semantic elaboration on associative recognition memory: an fMRI study.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2025
Same author

Toward a functional future for the cognitive neuroscience of human aging.

Neuron·2025
Same author

Endel Tulving (1927-2023).

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Memory, aging and the brain: Old findings and current issues.

Aging brain·2023
Same journal

Episodic and semantic memory contributions to imagination and creativity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

What is the relationship between stress and prospective memory in everyday environments?

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Revisiting the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: a metacognitive perspective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Beliefs about child witnesses: a survey of Danish legal professionals, social workers and psychologists.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Potto-biographical memory ≈ autobiographical memory: on the retrieval and organisation of fictional- and personal-event memories.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same journal

Conceptual and perceptual chunking of real-world objects in visual working memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
See all related articles

The levels of processing (LOP) theory significantly impacts memory research, influencing discussions on processing depth and encoding-retrieval interactions. This article explores LOP

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • The seminal 1972 article by Craik and Lockhart introduced the levels of processing (LOP) framework.
  • LOP theory posits that memory recall is a function of the depth of mental processing.
  • This framework has faced enduring critiques and ongoing debate within cognitive psychology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey the lasting contributions of the levels of processing (LOP) theory.
  • To address common criticisms and misconceptions surrounding LOP.
  • To explore future directions and potential applications of LOP in memory research.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and critical analysis of the levels of processing (LOP) framework.
  • Examination of core concepts including "depth" of processing, short-term memory, and consolidation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of encoding-retrieval interactions and levels of representation.

    • Main Results:

    • The LOP framework remains influential, shaping discussions on memory encoding and retrieval.
    • Key concepts like "depth" of processing require nuanced understanding and empirical validation.
    • Encoding-retrieval interactions and consolidation are critical factors within LOP.

    Conclusions:

    • The levels of processing (LOP) theory continues to offer valuable insights into memory.
    • Future research should explore levels of representation and refine LOP's role in cognitive models.
    • LOP's legacy lies in its emphasis on the active nature of memory encoding.