Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Stimulus-response compatibility in intensity-force relations.

Stefan Mattes1, Hartmut Leuthold, Rolf Ulrich

  • 1DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Stuttgart, Germany.

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology
|November 8, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same author

A sequential model of two-choice intensity identification.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

What is prepared in temporal preparation? A review and a historical appreciation.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

[Doping in recreational sports].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2026
Same author

Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The time-intensity uncertainty principle in vision.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Relations between emotion, illusory word perception, and orthographic repetition blindness: tests of binding theory.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Causal and noncausal conditionals: an integrated model of interpretation and reasoning.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Phonological similarity effects in verbal complex span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

By which name should I call thee? The consequences of having multiple names.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Stimulus similarity decrements in children's working memory span.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
Same journal

Lag-1 sparing in the attentional blink: benefits and costs of integrating two events into a single episode.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2005
See all related articles

The intensity-force compatibility effect, where reaction times depend on stimulus intensity and response force, is stronger for auditory than visual stimuli. This suggests modality-specific coding influences how we process sensory input and motor output.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • The intensity-force compatibility effect describes faster reaction times when stimulus intensity (e.g., loudness, brightness) matches response force (e.g., pressing harder or softer).
  • Previous research by Romaiguère et al. (1993) identified this effect, suggesting a symbolic coding mechanism linking stimulus properties to response characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of sensory modality in the intensity-force compatibility effect.
  • To refine the understanding of the underlying cognitive processes, specifically exploring modality-specific coding.

Main Methods:

  • Six experiments were conducted using tasks that required participants to respond with different force levels to stimuli of varying intensities.
  • Stimuli were presented in both auditory and visual modalities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments systematically varied the mapping between stimulus intensity and required response force.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant compatibility effect was observed, with reaction times being shorter for congruent mappings (e.g., high intensity to high force) than incongruent mappings.
    • The compatibility effect was consistently larger for auditory stimuli compared to visual stimuli across multiple experiments.
    • The effect persisted even when stimulus intensity was rendered irrelevant to the task, further highlighting modality differences.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings indicate that modality-specific codes play a crucial role in the intensity-force compatibility effect.
    • Sensory modality influences the efficiency of the cognitive processes linking perception to action.
    • The results refine existing theories by emphasizing the interaction between sensory input characteristics and response execution.