Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The G2 chromosomal radiosensitivity assay.

P E Bryant1, L Gray, A C Riches

  • 1School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Scotland, UK. peb@st-and.ac.uk

International Journal of Radiation Biology
|November 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: Inter-Assay Comparison of Eight Dosimetry Assays.

Radiation research·2023
Same author

What We Have Learned from RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparisons Since 2012 With Focus on ILC 2021.

Radiation research·2023
Same author

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Assay.

Radiation research·2023
Same author

RENEB Inter-Laboratory Comparison 2021: The Dicentric Chromosome Assay.

Radiation research·2023
Same author

Prevalence, radiographic resolution and outcomes of slab fractures of the third and central tarsal bones in juvenile Thoroughbred horses.

Australian veterinary journal·2019
Same author

Survey of trainers on the use of swimming exercise for Standardbred racehorses in Australia.

Australian veterinary journal·2019
Same journal

Adaptation of bacteria in mountains: investigation of the relationship with background radiation and mountain landscape.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
Same journal

Cellular effects induced by insoluble radioactive cesium-bearing microparticles derived from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
Same journal

Biochemical, structural and mutational landscapes of base excision repair enzymes and cancer: from atomic resolution to tumor signatures.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
Same journal

Cardiac substructure dose and the risk of arrhythmia after curative radiotherapy for thymic tumors.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
Same journal

Immunometabolic mechanisms of ionizing radiation in a mouse model of gastrointestinal acute radiation syndrome.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
Same journal

Tumor-associated macrophage-derived exosomes promote radio-resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells accompanied by suppression of the cGAS/STING pathway.

International journal of radiation biology·2026
See all related articles

The G2 assay shows promise as a sensitive cancer susceptibility marker, especially in population studies. While blood storage is feasible, careful control of transport conditions is crucial for reliable radiosensitivity testing.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Sciences
  • Genetics
  • Oncology

Background:

  • The G2 assay is a potential tool for assessing cancer susceptibility.
  • Reproducibility of the G2 assay requires stringent experimental conditions.
  • The assay is particularly valuable for population-based studies.

Framework:

  • The G2 assay measures chromosomal aberrations in cells.
  • Scoring involves identifying and summing gaps and breaks.
  • Standardization of scoring, including distinguishing aligned vs. misaligned discontinuities, is noted for record-keeping.

Implementation:

  • Immediate blood culture is preferred for optimal G2 assay results.
  • Overnight blood storage at ambient or 4°C does not significantly impact G2 scores.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Blood transport conditions can introduce variability and require strict control.

    • Implications:

    • The G2 assay can serve as a sensitive marker for cancer susceptibility.
    • Individual radiosensitivity assessment may necessitate multiple G2 assays due to biological variability.
    • Controlled experimental and transport conditions are key for reliable G2 assay outcomes in research and clinical settings.