Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A comparison of ecotoxicological tests.

James L Botsford1

  • 1Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001, USA.

Alternatives to Laboratory Animals : ATLA
|November 16, 2002
PubMed
Summary

A new, cost-effective bacterial toxicity test was developed and validated against 23 other methods. This rapid toxicity assessment shows strong correlation with ecotoxicological tests, offering a reliable alternative for chemical safety evaluation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Conference Diary.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Spotlight on Three Rs Progress.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Resources Round-up.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Editorial.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

<i>Galleria mellonella</i> as an invertebrate screening model for biocompatibility and <i>in vivo</i> functionality testing of imaging contrast agents.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026
Same journal

Data-driven science, ethics and risk: Building knowledge of key ethics-risk intersections relevant to public sector decision-making.

Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA·2026

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Toxicology
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Accurate and efficient toxicity testing is crucial for environmental and human health risk assessment.
  • Existing toxicity assays vary in cost, speed, and reliability, necessitating the development of improved methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a simple, inexpensive, and rapid bacterial toxicity test.
  • To compare the performance of the new bacterial test against a range of established ecotoxicological and mammalian toxicity assays.

Main Methods:

  • A novel toxicity test utilizing a bacterium as the indicator organism was developed.
  • The new test was compared against 23 other toxicity assessment methods.
  • Detailed comparisons were performed using 35 chemicals from the Multicentre Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity list, including Microtox, Biotox, Daphnia magna, rat hepatocytes, and ascites tumor cells.

Main Results:

  • The bacterial toxicity test demonstrated an average correlation coefficient of 0.800 across 23 comparative tests (range: 0.580–0.950).
  • Correlations with ecotoxicological assays (Microtox, Biotox, Daphnia magna, rat hepatocytes, ascites tumor cells) ranged from 0.871 to 0.933 for 35 chemicals.
  • Comparisons with rodent LD50 values and human lethal dose estimates showed lower correlation coefficients (0.580–0.770).

Conclusions:

  • The developed bacterial toxicity test provides data comparable to established ecotoxicological methods.
  • The test is a simple, inexpensive, and rapid tool for toxicity determination.
  • This method offers a viable alternative for assessing chemical toxicity, particularly in environmental contexts.

Related Experiment Videos