Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surgical performance measurement.

Tom Treasure1, Oswaldo Valencia, Chris Sherlaw-Johnson

  • 1Department of Cardiological Sciences, St Georges Hospital, London, UK.

Health Care Management Science
|November 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC): Prospective Cohort with its Nested Randomized Controlled Trial Provides an Example Distinguishing Causation From Association.

Annals of surgical oncology·2026
Same author

Implementing artificial intelligence in chest diagnostics for lung disease: A mixed-methods evaluation.

Health and social care delivery research·2026
Same author

Evaluating real-world mortality risk after defibrillator implantation.

The British journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

Staff experiences of implementing patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) in the NHS in England: findings from a rapid qualitative evaluation.

Journal of health services research & policy·2026
Same author

Procurement and early deployment of artificial intelligence tools for chest diagnostics in NHS services in England: a rapid, mixed method evaluation.

EClinicalMedicine·2025
Same author

Implementation, Experiences, Impact, and Costs of Artificial Intelligence in Chest Diagnostics: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Evaluation.

JMIR research protocols·2025
Same journal

Optimal hospital capacity management during demand surges.

Health care management science·2026
Same journal

Towards optimal valve prescription for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) surgery: a machine learning approach.

Health care management science·2026
Same journal

Efficient engagement: opportunities for mobile methadone maintenance in geographically underserved areas.

Health care management science·2026
Same journal

Ahead of the ambulance: Optimizing volunteer training.

Health care management science·2026
Same journal

A novel multi-criteria doctor ranking method considering patient risk attitudes and compensatory relationships.

Health care management science·2026
Same journal

Toward generalizable and interpretable machine learning models in healthcare: Insights from ICU outcome predictions.

Health care management science·2026
See all related articles

Effective surgical performance measurement is crucial for patient safety. This paper explores methods for assessing surgeon competence, drawing on cardiothoracic surgery and operational research expertise.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality and Safety
  • Surgical Performance Metrics
  • Medical Professional Assessment

Background:

  • Recent high-profile surgical performance failures have increased scrutiny on surgeon competency.
  • The Bristol Royal Infirmary Public Inquiry highlighted the urgent need for robust performance monitoring systems.
  • Existing methods for evaluating surgical skill require refinement to ensure patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline key challenges in measuring and monitoring surgical performance.
  • To present methods for distinguishing between highly competent and less competent surgeons.
  • To provide practical examples from cardiothoracic surgery and operational research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing surgical performance measurement frameworks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of operational research techniques applied to healthcare.
  • Case studies from cardiothoracic surgery illustrating performance assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Identification of critical factors influencing surgical performance evaluation.
    • Development of a framework for assessing surgeon competence.
    • Demonstration of the utility of operational research in surgical monitoring.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective surgical performance measurement is essential for maintaining high standards of care.
    • A multidisciplinary approach combining surgical expertise and data analysis is vital.
    • Implementing standardized monitoring can improve patient outcomes and surgical quality.