Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Minimally Invasive Direct Access Surgical Technology - MIDAST(TM).

G J Jako1, R A Von Jako

  • 1Boston University School of Medicine, Boston.

Surgical Technology International
|November 27, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electromagnetic navigation for percutaneous guide-wire insertion: accuracy and efficiency compared to conventional fluoroscopic guidance.

NeuroImage·2009
Same author

Randomized clinical trial of conventional cholecystectomy versus minicholecystectomy.

The British journal of surgery·1998
Same author

A randomized comparison between minilaparotomy and conventional approach for aortoiliac reconstructive surgery.

Acta chirurgica Hungarica·1997
Same author

Minilaparotomies with a new special instrument.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·1996
Same author

Videotunneler for minimal and direct access aortoiliac reconstructive surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·1996
Same author

Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy.

The British journal of surgery·1996
Same journal

Do Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Robot-Assisted and Navigated Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Differences?

Surgical technology international·2025
Same journal

Clinical and Radiological Results of the Integrated Acetabular MUTARS® RS Cup System in the Revision of Geriatric Patients.

Surgical technology international·2025
Same journal

Does Robotic-Assisted Functional Knee Positioning Result in Better Functional Outcomes One Year After Surgery.

Surgical technology international·2025
Same journal

One-Year Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Augmented with a Reinforced Bioinductive Implant.

Surgical technology international·2025
Same journal

In-Office Skin Grafting for Lower Extremity Wounds.

Surgical technology international·2025
Same journal

Revision ACL Reconstruction with Hamstring Autograft from the Contralateral Leg With and Without Internal Brace: A Comparative Study.

Surgical technology international·2025
See all related articles

Minimally invasive direct access surgical technology (MIDAST) advances surgical techniques, moving beyond traditional large incisions and bulky instruments. This innovation enhances surgical access and visualization, improving upon historical surgical practices.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Technology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Endoscopic Microsurgery

Background:

  • Historically, surgery relied on large incisions for access and manipulation with bulky instruments.
  • Illumination evolved from natural sources to artificial lighting over centuries.
  • Previous otolaryngology and endoscopic microsurgery experiences informed the development of new technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and describe the minimally invasive direct access surgical technology (MIDAST).
  • To highlight the evolution of surgical access and instrumentation.
  • To position MIDAST as an advancement over traditional surgical methods.

Main Methods:

  • Leveraging experience from otolaryngology and endoscopic microsurgery.
  • Developing advanced surgical access techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focusing on improved instrumentation and visualization.

    • Main Results:

    • MIDAST represents a significant departure from historical surgical access methods.
    • The technology builds upon established principles of microsurgery and endoscopic procedures.
    • It offers a new paradigm for surgical manipulation and access.

    Conclusions:

    • MIDAST signifies a progression in surgical technology.
    • The approach aims to overcome limitations of traditional invasive procedures.
    • Further application and development of MIDAST are implied.