Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality collaboratives: lessons from research.

J ØVretveit1, P Bate, P Cleary

  • 1The Nordic School of Public Health, Goteborg, Sweden The Health Services Management Centre, Birmingham University, UK. jovret@aol.com

Quality & Safety in Health Care
|December 7, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cumulative live birth rates following testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive male infertility.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2026
Same author

Improving maternity and neonatal care in England: protocol for a formative evaluation of the implementation of the core competency framework to enhance multi-professional practice.

BMC pregnancy and childbirth·2026
Same author

Segmental 3D image-guided robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (3D-IGRAPN) in selected cases of localized renal urothelial carcinoma.

World journal of urology·2025
Same author

Recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Comparison of two surgical techniques.

The French journal of urology·2025
Same author

A retrospective analysis of post-mortem findings in New Zealand weka (<i>Gallirallus australis</i>), 1995-2022.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2024
Same author

HIF-1 inactivation empowers HIF-2 to drive hypoxia adaptation in aggressive forms of medulloblastoma.

Cell death discovery·2024
Same journal

Organisational culture: variation across hospitals and connection to patient safety climate.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The Rhode Island ICU collaborative: a model for reducing central line-associated bloodstream infection and ventilator-associated pneumonia statewide.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Assessing and improving safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

The WHO patient safety curriculum guide for medical schools.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
Same journal

Improvement leaders: what do they and should they do? A summary of a review of research.

Quality & safety in health care·2010
See all related articles

Quality improvement collaboratives show varied success in healthcare. Researchers identified 10 key challenges for organizers and teams to enhance patient care and organizational performance.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) are widely adopted globally for rapid healthcare enhancement.
  • Limited independent evidence exists on the cost-effectiveness and optimal implementation of QICs.
  • Systematic evaluations of QICs are underway in North America, the UK, and Sweden.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To synthesize shared insights from researchers evaluating quality improvement collaboratives.
  • To identify factors contributing to the success and challenges of QICs.
  • To provide evidence-based guidelines for improving QIC effectiveness.

Main Methods:

  • Consensus-building through two meetings of researchers conducting systematic evaluations of QICs.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of preliminary evidence from ongoing QIC evaluations.
  • Identification and articulation of common challenges and success factors.

    • Main Results:

    • Some QICs have demonstrably improved patient care and organizational performance.
    • Significant variability exists in the effectiveness of different QICs and teams.
    • Ten key challenges were identified that organizers and teams must address for successful improvement.

    Conclusions:

    • While some QICs yield positive results, their effectiveness varies significantly.
    • Addressing identified challenges is crucial for optimizing QIC outcomes.
    • The findings offer practical guidelines for QIC organizers and teams, informing future research and innovation spread in healthcare.