Related Experiment Videos
Determination of As in environmental solid matrix
E Beccaloni1, L Musmeci, E Stacul
1Laboratory of Environmental Hygiene, National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
|December 11, 2002
Summary
Determining arsenic (As) in environmental samples is challenging. This study found instrumental reading, not sample preparation, causes errors in As analysis using ICP-AES and AAS techniques.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Analytical Chemistry
- Spectroscopy
Background:
- European environmental guidelines emphasize arsenic (As) concentration in biomasses and complex matrices.
- Accurate As determination is crucial for environmental monitoring and compliance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify technical-analytical challenges in As determination using ICP-AES and AAS.
- To evaluate different instrumental spectroscopy techniques for As analysis in environmental solid matrices.
Main Methods:
- Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES).
- Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS) with Deuterium (D2) and Zeeman background correction.
- Electrothermal Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (ETAAS).
- Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS).
- Analysis of certified reference materials: BCR 141 R (calcareous soil) and IAEA-356 (marine sediment).
Main Results:
- Spectral interference observed with ICP-AES.
- Matrix interference encountered with AAS, particularly ETAAS with D2 correction and HAAS.
- ETAAS with Zeeman background correction at 193.70 nm showed minimal matrix interference.
- ICP-MS and HAAS results confirmed potential for data overestimation and considerable standard deviation, respectively.
- Instrumental reading, not sample mineralization, identified as the critical step for As determination accuracy.
Conclusions:
- ETAAS with Zeeman background correction is a reliable method for As determination in environmental matrices.
- Most other evaluated techniques (ICP-AES, AAS variants, ICP-MS) present specific drawbacks and offer no significant advantage.
- Accurate instrumental reading is paramount for reliable As quantification in complex environmental samples.