Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dissociating sentential prosody from sentence processing: activation interacts with task demands.

Elena Plante1, Marlena Creusere, Cynthia Sabin

  • 1Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0071, USA. eplante@u.arizona.edu

Neuroimage
|December 17, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning to Learn: Initial Treatment of a Partially Acquired Grammatical Form Speeds Later Learning of Rarely Used Forms for Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Language, speech, and hearing services in schools·2026
Same author

Auditory statistical learning in young children: the feasibility of a novel task and the role of attention and working memory.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2025
Same author

Developmental Language Disorder as a Multidimensional Neurodevelopmental Spectrum: Implications for Diagnosis.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025
Same author

What Matters When Providing Conversational Recast Treatment? A Multilevel Modeling Analysis.

American journal of speech-language pathology·2025
Same author

Determining the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Test of Integrated Language and Literacy Skills for College Students.

American journal of speech-language pathology·2023
Same author

Less Versus More: The Effect of Recast Length in Treatment of Grammatical Errors.

Language, speech, and hearing services in schools·2023
Same journal

Category-selective neural decreases in the human ventral occipito-temporal cortex as defined with intracranial recordings.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

EEG-Based Brain Fingerprints Elicited by Focal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

The Association between Brain Oscillatory Activity and Immediate Memory under Different Magnetoencephalography Paradigms: A population-based Study.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Brain response to awe experiences in virtual reality: an integrated linear and nonlinear EEG analysis.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Convergent imaging and genetic signatures of gray matter atrophy in Parkinson's disease.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

What actually matters in multi-compartment EEG head models: A controlled FEM study of parcellation granularity, skull layering, mesh quality, noise, and inverse solver.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

Brain activity for sentence structure and prosody differs based on memory demands. Working memory load influences how the brain processes language components, showing distinct frontal activation patterns.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Understanding how the brain processes language is crucial.
  • Distinguishing between sentence structure and prosody processing is key.
  • The role of working memory in language comprehension needs further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural representation of sentence processing versus syntactic prosody.
  • To examine the interaction between these language components and working memory load.
  • To identify differential brain activation patterns under varying cognitive demands.

Main Methods:

  • Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) was used to scan twelve adult participants.
  • Participants listened to filtered and unfiltered sentences under passive listening and active memory tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Task conditions manipulated working memory load during auditory language comprehension.

    • Main Results:

    • Temporal activation patterns for prosody and sentence stimuli differed significantly during passive listening.
    • Increased memory demands led to frontal brain activation.
    • This frontal activation was differentially lateralized for sentence and prosodic stimuli.

    Conclusions:

    • Sentence and prosodic stimuli elicit distinct neural activation patterns.
    • Working memory load significantly modulates brain activity in language processing.
    • The brain differentially allocates resources for processing sentence structure and prosody based on memory demands.