Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
The relation between methods and recommendations in clinical practice guidelines for hypertension and hyperlipidemia
Atle Fretheim1, John W Williams, Andrew D Oxman
1Department of Health Services Research, Norwegian Directorate for Health Social Welfare, PO Box 8054 Dep, N-0031 Oslo, Norway. atle.fretheim@shdir.no
Insights
Clinical practice guidelines for hypertension and hyperlipidemia often lack rigorous development methods. This can lead to more aggressive treatment recommendations, impacting patient care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) aim to standardize patient care.
- The methods used to develop CPGs may influence their recommendations.
- Hypertension and hyperlipidemia management are areas with numerous CPGs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the relationship between the development methodologies of CPGs and their resultant recommendations.
- To assess the rigor of methods used in CPGs for hypertension and hyperlipidemia.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of CPGs for hypertension or hyperlipidemia was conducted.
- Two independent reviewers assessed guideline development using 8 predefined criteria.
- Recommendations regarding treatment thresholds, initial drug selection, and screening aggressiveness were evaluated.
Main Results:
- 33 CPGs were reviewed; only 6 met 5 or more of the 8 rigor criteria.
- Fewer than 50% of guidelines met 5 specific criteria.
- Significant variation in recommendations was observed.
- Guidelines with less rigorous methods tended to suggest more aggressive interventions.
- CPGs from specialty societies were less likely to meet rigor criteria.
Conclusions:
- CPG developers employing less rigorous methods were more likely to advocate for aggressive interventions in hypertension and hyperlipidemia.
- The quality of guideline development methods is associated with the aggressiveness of clinical recommendations.
Objective:
To assess the association between methods used to develop clinical practice guidelines and the recommendations that are made.
Study Design:
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for hypertension or hyperlipidemia.
Outcomes Measured:
Two people independently appraised guideline methods by using 8 criteria and the aggressiveness of recommendations for treatment thresholds, initial drug selection, and screening.
Results:
We identified 33 guidelines. Only 6 fulfilled 5 or more of the 8 criteria. For 5 of the criteria, fewer than 50% of the guidelines fulfilled those criteria. There was wide variation in recommendations for treatment thresholds, drug selection, and cholesterol screening. Guidelines that did not fulfill the criteria tended to suggest more aggressive recommendations than did guidelines that met the criteria. For 6 of the 8 criteria, guidelines published by specialty societies were less likely to fulfill them compared with guidelines not published by specialty societies.
Conclusions:
Guideline developers who did not use rigorous methods tended to promote intervening more aggressively for hypertension and hyperlipidemia.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Lipid-Lowering Drugs: Statins and Miscellaneous Agents
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology