Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reasoning with quantifiers.

Bart Geurts1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of Nijmegen, PO Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands. bart.guerts@phil.kun.nl

Cognition
|December 18, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Making Sense of Self Talk.

Review of philosophy and psychology·2018
Same author

Overspecification of color, pattern, and size: salience, absoluteness, and consistency.

Frontiers in psychology·2015
Same author

How to pass the false-belief task before your fourth birthday.

Psychological science·2012
Same author

Exceptions and anomalies: an ERP study on context sensitivity in autism.

Neuropsychologia·2010
Same author

Reasoning with exceptions: an event-related brain potentials study.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2009
Same author

Defeasible reasoning in high-functioning adults with autism: evidence for impaired exception-handling.

Neuropsychologia·2008

This study connects natural language semantics and psychological studies on deductive reasoning. A new logic based on quantifier monotonicity explains syllogistic reasoning, including cardinal quantifiers.

Area of Science:

  • Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology
  • Natural Language Semantics
  • Deductive Reasoning

Background:

  • Quantification is a central topic in natural language semantics.
  • Syllogistic inference is a key area in psychological studies of deductive reasoning.
  • These two fields have historically remained disconnected.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To bridge the gap between semantic research on quantification and psychological studies of syllogistic reasoning.
  • To demonstrate the benefits of semantic insights for understanding syllogistic reasoning.
  • To introduce a novel logical framework for syllogistic reasoning.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a simple logic centered on the monotonicity properties of quantified statements.
  • Application of this logic to explain existing experimental evidence on syllogistic reasoning.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Testing the logic against new experimental data involving cardinal quantifiers (e.g., "at least n", "at most n").

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed logic successfully accounts for established experimental findings in syllogistic reasoning.
    • The logic provides an explanation for data from a new experiment using cardinal quantifiers.
    • Existing theories of syllogistic reasoning fail to explain the data from the cardinal quantifier experiment.

    Conclusions:

    • Monotonicity properties are crucial for understanding quantification and a broader range of semantic phenomena.
    • The developed logic offers a unified account of syllogistic reasoning, integrating semantic and psychological perspectives.
    • This approach advances the understanding of how quantifiers influence human deductive reasoning.