Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Amiodarone and mortality among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction with atrial fibrillation
Michael J Kilborn1, Saif S Rathore, Bernard J Gersh
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Insights
Amiodarone did not increase mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and atrial fibrillation. Further trials are needed to confirm the safety of this antiarrhythmic drug in this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Amiodarone is considered safe for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients at risk of sudden cardiac death.
- Limited data exists on amiodarone safety in AMI patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety of amiodarone in elderly patients hospitalized with AMI and atrial fibrillation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 17,597 elderly patients discharged after AMI and atrial fibrillation.
- Propensity score methods were used to analyze the association of amiodarone with mortality.
Main Results:
- Thirty-day mortality rates were similar between amiodarone and no amiodarone groups (6.8% vs 5.4%, P=.21).
- One-year mortality was higher in the amiodarone group (35.6% vs 31.6%, P=.001).
- Multivariable analysis showed no association between amiodarone and 30-day or long-term mortality.
Conclusions:
- Amiodarone was not independently linked to short-term or long-term mortality in this patient cohort.
- While potentially safe, further randomized controlled trials are necessary to confirm amiodarone's efficacy and safety in AMI patients with atrial fibrillation.
Background:
Amiodarone has been shown to be safe in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who are at risk for sudden cardiac death. However, there is limited data concerning the safety of amiodarone in patients who experience AMI complicated by atrial fibrillation.
Methods:
To determine the safety of amiodarone therapy, we conducted a retrospective analysis of elderly patients hospitalized with AMI who experienced atrial fibrillation and had survived to hospital discharge (n = 17,597). Amiodarone prescribed at discharge was evaluated for its association with short-term and long-term mortality in crude and adjusted analyses employing propensity score methods.
Results:
Of the 17,597 patients, 550 patients (3.1%) were prescribed amiodarone, 2317 patients (13.2%) were prescribed other antiarrhythmic agents (excluded from analysis), and 14,730 (83.7%) were prescribed no antiarrhythmic medication at discharge. Thirty-day mortality rates were similar for patients prescribed amiodarone and those not prescribed amiodarone (6.8% amiodarone vs 5.4% no amiodarone, P =.21), but mortality at 1 year was higher among patients prescribed amiodarone (35.6% vs 31.6%, P =.001). However, amiodarone was not associated with mortality at 30 days (odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.53-1.20) or at long-term follow-up (mean duration 612 days, hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.92-1.18) after multivariable modeling.
Conclusions:
Amiodarone was not independently associated with short-term or long-term mortality in elderly patients discharged after a hospitalization for AMI complicated by atrial fibrillation. Although our data suggest that amiodarone may be safe to use in this population, randomized controlled trial data are needed to confirm this finding.
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
