Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attentional limitations in processing sequentially presented vibrotactile targets.

Anne P Hillstrom1, Kimron L Shapiro, Charles Spence

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Arlington, Texas 76019-0528, USA. hillstrom@uta.edu

Perception & Psychophysics
|December 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Encouraging (Nudging) People to Increase Their Fluid Intake.

Nutrients·2023
Same author

Motion perception in touch: resolving contradictory findings by varying probabilities of different trial types.

Psychological research·2023
Same author

People with higher autistic traits show stronger binding for color-shape associations.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Food neophobia and its association with sociodemographic factors and food preferences among Bangladeshi university students: Evidence from a cross-sectional study.

Heliyon·2023
Same author

Relishing the taste of food.

Nature food·2023
Same author

Prunus persica in science, literature and art.

Nature food·2023
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

This study explored the attentional blink (AB) using vibration streams. Unlike typical visual AB effects, accuracy depended on target separation, suggesting attention may be engaged even when targets aren't reported.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • The attentional blink (AB) is a phenomenon where attention is impaired for a second target if it appears shortly after a first target.
  • Previous research primarily investigated the AB using visual and auditory stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the attentional blink occurs in tactile (vibrational) perception.
  • To examine how different target properties (frequency, intensity, duration, location) influence the AB in tactile streams.
  • To compare the AB in tactile perception with the conventional AB in visual perception.

Main Methods:

  • Participants experienced rapid, serially presented streams of vibrations.
  • They responded to specific targets within these streams.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiments varied the reported attribute of the target (frequency, intensity, duration, location) and the temporal separation between targets.

    • Main Results:

    • A conventional attentional blink pattern was observed only when participants judged target location.
    • In experiments judging frequency, intensity, or duration, accuracy was dependent on target separation, irrespective of whether the first target was reported.
    • This suggests that attention may be engaged by the first target even if it is not consciously reported.

    Conclusions:

    • The attentional blink may manifest differently in tactile perception compared to visual perception.
    • Tactile frequency, intensity, and duration judgments might not be susceptible to the same attentional limitations as location judgments.
    • Location-based attention might be particularly robust or interact uniquely with attentional blink paradigms.