A national two year follow up study of extremely low birthweight infants born in 1996-1997

V Tommiska1, K Heinonen, P Kero

  • 1Hospital for Children and Adolescents, University of Helsinki, Finland.

Insights

Extremely low birthweight infants show high rates of impairments, particularly ophthalmic abnormalities, which decrease with higher birth weight and gestational age. However, neurodevelopmental outcomes did not significantly differ across birthweight groups.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal care
  • Developmental pediatrics
  • Public health

Background:

  • Extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants face significant neurodevelopmental challenges.
  • Understanding long-term outcomes is crucial for improving neonatal care strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess neurodevelopmental outcomes in ELBW infants at 18 months corrected age.
  • To compare ELBW infant development with controls and identify risk factors for adverse outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • A national cohort of 211 ELBW infants (birth weight < 1000 g) was studied.
  • A regional subcohort (n=78) was compared to 75 full-term controls.
  • Assessments included neurological, speech, vision, hearing, and Bayley scales.

Main Results:

  • Prevalence of cerebral palsy was 11%, motor impairments 24%, ophthalmic abnormalities 23%, and speech delay 42%.
  • 42% had no impairment, while 18% were severely impaired.
  • Ophthalmic abnormalities decreased with increased birth weight and gestational age.

Conclusions:

  • Ophthalmic abnormalities in ELBW infants are linked to birth weight and gestational age.
  • No significant outcome differences were found between birthweight groups or among ELBW infants born at 22-26 weeks gestation.
  • Prognosis for ELBW infants may be improving, warranting further investigation.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD01:11

Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD

A complete procedure of testing the hypothesis about a population mean is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...