Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Finding the person in personal relationships.

Harry T Reis1, Anthony Capobianco, Fen-Fang Tsai

  • 1University of Rochester, USA.

Journal of Personality
|December 25, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is a happy marriage a double-edged sword for biological aging? Preliminary evidence for the moderating role of couples' health behaviors.

Brain, behavior, and immunity·2026
Same author

Daily closeness discrepancies and marital interaction quality in the context of chronic pain: mediating effect of loneliness.

The Gerontologist·2026
Same author

BCL6 regulates skeletal muscle mass and mitochondrial bioenergetics.

Molecular metabolism·2026
Same author

Hope for our future: Relational hope promotes relationship goal pursuit and well-being.

Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43)·2026
Same author

Women Are Slightly More Sexually Satisfied in Their Romantic Relationships Than Men: An Integrative Data Analytic Approach.

Archives of sexual behavior·2026
Same author

Relationship closeness in the context of chronic pain: Daily benefits and challenges for partners.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2025
Same journal

Identifying Robust Longitudinal Transactions Between Loneliness and the Big Five Personality Traits.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

The (Simp)le Truth About Excessive and Obsessive Romantic Behaviors in Men.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

The Robust Quadratic Association Between Resting Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Agreeableness: The Evidence From Two Samples in China.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

Ego, Elevation, and Exclusion: Bidirectional Prospective Associations Between Narcissism and Status and Inclusion.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

Life Narratives and the Ten Aspects of the Big Five Across Open-Ended and Targeted Prompts.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

Life Stories Matter: The Contribution of Narrative Identity to Personality Functioning and Functional Impairment.

Journal of personality·2026
See all related articles

Understanding close relationships requires more than just looking at static personality traits. This study proposes a dynamic, interdependence-focused approach to better analyze how individuals and their relationships evolve over time.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Relationship Science

Background:

  • Dispositional factors are widely recognized as influential in close relationships.
  • Existing research on personality's impact on relationships has yielded modest progress.
  • Current analyses often overemphasize static, global dispositions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose advanced theoretical and methodological principles for studying close relationships.
  • To integrate interdependence theory for a more sophisticated understanding of persons-in-relationship.
  • To guide future research on personality within relational contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis drawing on interdependence theory.
  • Conceptualizing relationships as dynamic, temporal, and interdependent processes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examining the limitations of static, global dispositional analyses.

    • Main Results:

    • Interaction in relationships is inherently dynamic and interdependent.
    • Static dispositions alone cannot fully explain relationship dynamics.
    • A sophisticated understanding requires analyzing persons-in-relationship within their interactional context.

    Conclusions:

    • Future research must adopt dynamic and interdependence-focused frameworks.
    • Moving beyond static trait analysis is crucial for advancing relationship science.
    • Understanding personality in relationships necessitates examining the interplay within the relationship itself.