Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A probabilistic approach to safety design: the two-element environment.

M N Leeming

    Medical Instrumentation
    |January 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces four electrical operators (G, E, T, C) to assess patient electrical safety. Findings question grounding strategies, suggesting ungrounding may be safer in certain scenarios.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Validity and clinical engineering indicators.

    Biomedical instrumentation & technology·1997
    Same author

    Investigating cardiovascular responses during social interactions.

    The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·1994
    Same author

    Transformation of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis by electroporation.

    American journal of veterinary research·1991
    Same author

    Licking patterns for sucrose solutions by young and aged squirrel monkeys.

    Physiology & behavior·1986
    Same author

    Protection of the "electrically susceptible patient": a discussion of systems and methods.

    Anesthesiology·1973
    Same author

    Low voltage, direct current plethysmograph burns.

    Medical research engineering·1971

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Electrical Safety in Healthcare

    Background:

    • Hospitalized patients are exposed to electrical equipment with varying power statuses.
    • Current electrical safety models may not fully capture all risks.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop a probabilistic model for assessing electrical danger in patient environments.
    • To evaluate the efficacy of grounding versus ungrounding strategies.

    Main Methods:

    • Defined four stochastic operators (G, E, T, C) representing grounding, leakage, element contact, and patient contact.
    • Formulated the probability of electrical danger using these operators in a two-element environment.

    Main Results:

    • The probabilistic model demonstrates that ungrounding can be safer than grounding in specific situations.
    • This highlights limitations in traditional grounding-based electrical safety approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • A probabilistic approach using electrical operators offers a more nuanced view of patient electrical safety.
    • Further data collection and analysis are needed to refine these electrical safety models.

    Related Experiment Videos