Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

Imaging In-Stent Restenosis: An Inexpensive, Reliable, and Rapid Preclinical Model
Published on: September 14, 2009
Clinical restenosis after coronary stenting: perspectives from multicenter clinical trials
Donald E Cutlip1, Manish S Chauhan, Donald S Baim
1Harvard Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. dcutlip@hcri.harvard.edu
Insights
Clinical restenosis after coronary stenting, including target lesion revascularization (TLR), occurs in 12-16% of patients within one year. Angiographic restenosis severity predicts TLR, influenced by factors like diabetes and stent length.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular medicine
- Interventional cardiology
- Medical device research
Background:
- Coronary stenting aims for long-term success, but restenosis and repeat revascularization remain significant challenges.
- This study analyzes clinical restenosis in a large cohort to understand its predictors and incidence post-stenting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate clinical restenosis rates and predictors in a large patient population undergoing coronary stent placement.
- To compare different definitions of clinical restenosis: target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and target vessel failure (TVF).
Main Methods:
- Pooled data from 6,186 patients (6,219 lesions) from recent coronary stent trials.
- Clinical restenosis defined as TLR, TVR, or TVF beyond 30 days post-procedure.
- Analysis of angiographic follow-up data to correlate with clinical outcomes.
Main Results:
- One-year rates: 12.2% TLR, 14.3% TVR, 16.0% TVF, significantly higher than six-month rates.
- Angiographic restenosis severity (> or =50% diameter stenosis) directly correlated with TLR likelihood.
- Independent predictors of TLR included smaller MLD, longer stent length, diabetes, unstable angina, and hypertension.
Conclusions:
- Clinical restenosis at one year post-stenting is primarily driven by TLR.
- Predictors of clinical restenosis align with those for angiographic restenosis.
- Lower rates of clinical restenosis compared to angiographic were observed due to infrequent TLR in less severe angiographic lesions.
Objectives:
We sought to evaluate clinical restenosis in a large population of patients who had undergone coronary stent placement.
Background:
One-year success after coronary stenting is limited mainly by restenosis of and requirement for repeat revascularization of the treated lesion. We studied 6,186 patients (6,219 lesions) pooled from several recently completed coronary stent trials. Clinical restenosis was defined using three different definitions: target lesion revascularization (TLR) beyond 30 days, target vessel revascularization (TVR) beyond 30 days, and target vessel failure (TVF), defined as TVR, any death, or myocardial infarction (MI) of the target vessel territory after hospital discharge.
Results:
By one year, 638 (12.2%) patients had TLR, 748 (14.3%) had TVR, and 848 (16.0%) had TVF, more than two-thirds higher than the rate of these end points at six months. The severity of angiographic restenosis (> or =50% follow-up diameter stenosis [DS]) in 419 of 1,437 (29%) patients undergoing routine angiographic follow-up correlated directly with the likelihood of TLR (73% vs. 26% for >70% DS compared with <60% DS). Smaller pretreatment minimum lumen diameter (MLD), smaller final MLD, longer stent length, diabetes mellitus, unstable angina, and hypertension were independent predictors of TLR. Prior MI and current smoking were negative predictors.
Conclusions:
At one year after stenting, most clinical restenosis reflected TLR, which was predicted by the same variables previously associated with an increased risk of angiographic restenosis. The lower absolute rate of clinical restenosis relative to angiographic restenosis was due to infrequent TLR in lesions with less severe (<60% DS) angiographic renarrowing.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

