Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2026

The Optokinetic Response as a Quantitative Measure of Visual Acuity in Zebrafish
Published on: October 9, 2013
Five-year change in visual acuity and incidence of visual impairment: the Blue Mountains Eye Study
Suriya Foran1, Paul Mitchell, Jie Jin Wang
1Department of Ophthalmology and the Save Sight and Westmead Millennium Institutes, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Purpose:
To describe the 5-year change in visual acuity and the incidence of visual impairment in a population-based cohort.
Design:
Population-based epidemiologic study.
Participants:
Of the 3654 participants of the Blue Mountains Eye Study (BMES I) baseline examination (aged 49 years+ during 1992-1994), 2335 were reexamined during the 5-year follow-up examinations from 1997 to 1999 (BMES II), and 543 persons had died since BMES I.
Methods:
Visual acuity was measured using a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart in both eyes separately before and after standardized refraction. Pupils were dilated and a detailed examination was performed.
Main Outcome Measures:
Visual impairment, after best refractive correction, was defined as any (visual acuity =20/40; =41 letters) and severe (visual acuity =20/200; 0-5 letters) in keeping with the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Incident binocular visual impairment was defined as visual acuity =20/40 in both eyes at follow-up, where visual acuity was >20/40 in both eyes at baseline. Incident binocular severe visual impairment was defined as visual acuity =20/200 in both eyes at follow-up, where visual acuity was >20/200 in both eyes at baseline. The incidence for three other levels of visual impairment is also given: <20/40, <20/70, and <20/200. Monocular visual impairment was defined as impairment in one eye only at follow-up, where both eyes were unimpaired at baseline. Incident doubling and halving of the visual angle were calculated.
Results:
Incidence rates for visual impairment increased significantly with age. Any incident impairment =20/40 occurred binocularly in 41 persons (1.9%) and monocularly in 150 persons (7.1%). Severe incident impairment =20/200 occurred binocularly in 3 persons (0.1%) and monocularly in 44 persons (2.1%). Incident impairment <20/40 occurred binocularly in 37 persons (1.7%) and monocularly in 134 persons (6.3%). Impairment <20/70 occurred binocularly in 15 persons (0.7%) and monocularly in 84 persons (3.8%). Impairment <20/200 occurred binocularly in 3 persons (0.1%) and monocularly in 44 persons (1.9%). Women consistently had a higher incidence of visual impairment than men, although this was often not statistically significant after adjusting for age. Increasing age was a strong predictor of visual impairment.
Conclusions:
This study has documented the 5-year incidence and causes of visual impairment in an older Australian population.

