Clinical negligence and causation and remoteness of damage
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

A Contusive Model of Unilateral Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Using the Infinite Horizon Impactor
Published on: July 24, 2012
1Nottingham Law School, Nottingham Trent University.
Abstract:
In this, the final article of this series on understanding negligence law, the causation and remoteness of damage is discussed. The final element that needs to be established in a negligence case is that the defendant's breach of duty was the cause of the claimant's loss and that this loss was not too far removed or remote from the actions of the defendant. The law involved in this area can be quite difficult to understand as some of the principles used are uncertain and the cases can be quite hard to draw together and reconcile.
Related Concept Videos
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts I
Intentional...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Torts II
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology