Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning, prediction and causal Bayes nets.

Clark Glymour1

  • 1Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, and the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, University of West Florida, Pensacola, USA

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|January 9, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Best practices for moving from correlation to causation in ecological research.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Causal Discovery and Forecasting in Nonstationary Environments with State-Space Models.

Proceedings of machine learning research·2019
Same author

Review of Causal Discovery Methods Based on Graphical Models.

Frontiers in genetics·2019
Same author

Inferring causation from time series in Earth system sciences.

Nature communications·2019
Same author

Behind Distribution Shift: Mining Driving Forces of Changes and Causal Arrows.

Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining·2019
Same author

Estimating feedforward and feedback effective connections from fMRI time series: Assessments of statistical methods.

Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2019
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Researchers are using causal Bayes nets to understand how people learn cause-and-effect relationships. This framework helps reinterpret experiments and predict causal inferences in various learning designs.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Developmental psychology
  • Causal learning

Background:

  • Human judgment and causal knowledge acquisition are central to cognitive and developmental psychology.
  • Existing theories of causal learning offer valuable insights but require further generalization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and explore the application of the causal Bayes net formalism in understanding causal knowledge acquisition.
  • To provide new normative standards for reinterpreting human judgment experiments.
  • To generalize existing theories of causal learning.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing the causal Bayes net formalism to represent causal, probabilistic, and intervention-based relationships.
  • Integrating hypotheses about learning algorithms with the causal Bayes net framework.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying the formalism to diverse experimental designs beyond classical cue-effect paradigms.
  • Main Results:

    • The causal Bayes net formalism offers a precise interpretation of mechanisms.
    • It enables the reinterpretation of experiments on human judgment against new normative standards.
    • The formalism allows for the generalization of existing causal learning theories.

    Conclusions:

    • The causal Bayes net formalism provides a powerful, unified framework for studying causal knowledge acquisition and inference.
    • This approach enhances our understanding of how individuals learn and reason about cause-and-effect relationships.
    • It opens new avenues for research in cognitive and developmental psychology by offering predictive power across various experimental designs.