Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiobjective optimization of combinatorial libraries.

D K Agrafiotis1

  • 13-Dimensional Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 665 Stockton Drive, Suite 104, Exton, Pennsylvania 19341, USA. dimitris.agrafiotis@3dp.com

Molecular Diversity
|January 29, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiobjective optimization of combinatorial libraries.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2002
Same author

Variable selection for QSAR by artificial ant colony systems.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2002
Same author

Combinatorial networks.

Journal of molecular graphics & modelling·2001
Same author

Design and prioritization of plates for high-throughput screening.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2001
Same author

A constant time algorithm for estimating the diversity of large chemical libraries.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2001
Same author

Introduction and foreward to the special issue on combinatorial library design.

Journal of molecular graphics & modelling·2001
Same journal

A cheminformatics and DFT exploration of a brominated sulfonamide with nonlinear optical response and preliminary in silico bioactivity assessment.

Molecular diversity·2026
Same journal

Triazoles as enzyme inhibitors: synthetic advances, mechanism of action, molecular docking studies and structure-activity relationships.

Molecular diversity·2026
Same journal

Synthesis of 9H-furo[2,3-f]chromenes using multicomponent reactions of euparin: investigation of biological activity.

Molecular diversity·2026
Same journal

Discovery of novel perillyl and myrtenyl nucleobase conjugates as dual anti-Alzheimer and antimicrobial agents.

Molecular diversity·2026
Same journal

Integrative network pharmacology and molecular modelling identify taxifolin as a potential modulator of melatonin receptor MT1 in mood disorders.

Molecular diversity·2026
Same journal

Design, synthesis and biological evaluations of novel VEGFR-2 inhibitors based on Fruquintinib and Cabozantinib.

Molecular diversity·2026
See all related articles

Designing optimal chemical libraries requires balancing multiple objectives. This study introduces multiobjective optimization algorithms using simulated annealing or evolutionary approaches for robust subset selection in drug discovery.

Area of Science:

  • Medicinal Chemistry
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Chemical Informatics

Background:

  • Combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening have revolutionized experimental design.
  • Library design involves complex, often conflicting, criteria beyond a single measure.
  • Real-world applications necessitate simultaneous optimization of multiple, sometimes uncertain, objectives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a class of algorithms for subset selection based on multiobjective optimization principles.
  • To develop a method for designing high-quality chemical libraries by optimizing multiple criteria simultaneously.
  • To provide a robust and extensible framework for combinatorial library design.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing an objective function that encodes diverse selection criteria.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employing simulated annealing or evolutionary algorithms for subset identification.
  • Accommodating criteria such as diversity, predicted activity (QSAR), similarity, property distributions, and reagent cost.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method identifies optimal or near-optimal subsets from vast possibilities.
    • It allows for the simultaneous selection of compounds from multiple libraries.
    • The approach offers user control over the significance of various design objectives.

    Conclusions:

    • Multiobjective optimization provides a powerful framework for designing complex chemical libraries.
    • The presented algorithms are robust, convergent, and extensible for practical applications.
    • This method facilitates the simultaneous optimization of diverse and conflicting design criteria in library synthesis.