Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential.

Andrew Charles James1

  • 1Center for Brain and Cognition Research, Unit 5549, National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) and Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France. andrew.james@anu.edu.au

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|January 31, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response.

Frontiers in neurology·2019
Same author

Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

Stimulus parameters for multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry.

Journal of glaucoma·2011
Same author

Frequency doubling illusion VEPs and automated perimetry in multiple sclerosis.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2006
Same author

A spatiotemporal white noise analysis of photoreceptor responses to UV and green light in the dragonfly median ocellus.

The Journal of general physiology·2005
Same author

Contrast response of temporally sparse dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials.

Visual neuroscience·2005
Same journal

Impact of Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits on Ellipsoid Zone-Related Thickness Metrics.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Profiling of Optic Nerves From SMOX-Deficient Mice Identifies Regulators of Neuroinflammation and Axonal Damage in Optic Neuritis.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Aflibercept and Faricimab Equipotently Restore Endothelial Barrier Function.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Spatial Decomposition of Longitudinal RNFL Maps Reveals Distinct Modes of Glaucomatous Progression With Structure-Function and Genetic Signatures.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

The CXXC1-IGFBP6 Axis Maintains Corneal Epithelial Differentiation via H3K4me3-Dependent Transcriptional Activation.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Archetypal Visual Field Analysis of Patients With Chronic Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy in Relation to Visual Recovery.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
See all related articles

Pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential (PPMVEP) offers a faster and more sensitive method for analyzing visual field characteristics. This technique provides larger amplitude responses and improved signal-to-noise ratio compared to contrast-reversal stimuli.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) is crucial for assessing visual field function.
  • Traditional contrast-reversal stimuli have limitations in terms of amplitude and recording time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential (PPMVEP) characteristics in normal subjects.
  • To compare PPMVEP with contrast-reversal mfVEP stimuli.
  • To evaluate response amplitude, waveform variation, and scalp distribution.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a 32-channel electroencephalogram system to record VEPs.
  • Stimulated 60 regions of a dartboard with pattern contrast pulses.
  • Employed multiple regression to estimate elementary responses and compared with contrast-reversal stimulation.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • PPMVEP responses showed similar waveforms and scalp topography to contrast-reversal but with 15 times greater amplitude.
  • Achieved a 1.9 times higher RMS signal-to-noise ratio, reducing recording time by 73% for equivalent SNR.
  • Demonstrated stereotypical waveform distribution based on stimulus location in the visual field.

Conclusions:

  • PPMVEP enables simultaneous characterization of 60 visual field regions for both eyes in under 7 minutes.
  • PPMVEP offers a more efficient and sensitive method for multifocal visual evoked potential analysis.
  • The methodology allows for flexible stimulus condition choices in multifocal analysis.