Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation
07:26

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation

Published on: November 26, 2019

Stimulus parameters for multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry.

Andrew Charles James1, Maria Kolic, Suzanne Margaret Bedford

  • 1The Vision Centre, Centre for Visual Sciences, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Journal of Glaucoma
|May 31, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reflections on the Safety and Stability of the Second-Generation Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Response.

Clinical & experimental ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Objective perimetry and diabetic retinopathy progression: a 10-year follow-up study.

Frontiers in endocrinology·2026
Same author

Clinical profile and associated risk factors of diabetic retinopathy at a tertiary eye center in Brunei Darussalam.

Taiwan journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Inherited Retinal Disease or Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Predictive Value of Genetic Testing in Macular Disease With Atypical Atrophy.

Clinical & experimental ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Surgical Stability and Safety During a 2-Year Clinical Trial.

Clinical & experimental ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Face and Available Chair Detection and Localization With a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis.

Translational vision science & technology·2025
Same journal

Factors Associated With Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Asymmetry in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Among Individuals of African Ancestry.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same journal

Haploinsufficiency of PITX2 in Four Chinese Families with Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same journal

Intraocular Pressure-Lowering Effect of Omidenepag Isopropyl as a Predictor for the Efficacy of Laser Trabeculoplasty.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same journal

Comparative Outcomes Between Micropulse and Slow-Coagulation Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Eyes With Good Visual Acuity.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same journal

Machine Learning With Optical Coherence Tomography for Glaucoma Diagnosis.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
Same journal

GATT-First Surgical Sequence Reduces Complications in Combined Phacoemulsification-GATT Surgery for Glaucoma.

Journal of glaucoma·2026
See all related articles

This study compared 10 multifocal visual field tests using pupillary responses to find the best diagnostic method for glaucoma. The optimal stimulus parameters achieved high sensitivity in detecting glaucomatous visual field defects.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Glaucoma diagnosis relies on visual field testing, but existing methods have limitations.
  • Pupillary responses to multifocal stimuli offer a novel approach to visual field assessment.
  • Optimizing stimulus parameters is crucial for enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic power of 10 multifocal visual field stimulus variants using pupillary responses.
  • To identify optimal stimulus parameters for accurate glaucoma detection.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of the multifocal pupillary optokinetic perimetry (mfPOP) method.

Main Methods:

  • Compared 10 stimulus variants (varying presentation rate, duration, luminance, flicker) in normal and glaucoma subjects.

More Related Videos

Quantification of Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice
09:28

Quantification of Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice

Published on: June 23, 2023

Multifocal Electroretinograms
16:49

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Published on: December 4, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation
07:26

Assessing Pupil-linked Changes in Locus Coeruleus-mediated Arousal Elicited by Trigeminal Stimulation

Published on: November 26, 2019

Quantification of Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice
09:28

Quantification of Visual Feature Selectivity of the Optokinetic Reflex in Mice

Published on: June 23, 2023

Multifocal Electroretinograms
16:49

Multifocal Electroretinograms

Published on: December 4, 2011

  • Recorded pupillary responses to multifocal stimuli (24 regions/eye) using video cameras.
  • Verified diagnostic status with slit-lamp investigation, tonometry, perimetry, and OCT.

    • Main Results:

    • The best stimulus variant achieved a sensitivity of 1.0 for moderate/severe glaucomatous fields at a 0.05 false positive rate.
    • Several stimulus conditions showed median signal-to-noise ratios exceeding 4 (t-statistics).
    • Optimal parameters included stimulus delivery rates of ~1 presentation/region/s and luminance around 150 cd/m².

    Conclusions:

    • Stimulus parameters around 1 presentation/region/s and 150 cd/m² luminance offer the best diagnostic performance.
    • The mfPOP method provides detailed information on response delays and visual field defects.
    • mfPOP offers advantages over automated perimetry by assessing regional afferent and efferent pathway function.