Related Experiment Videos
[Assessment of pelvic floor dysfunction. Terminology standardization]
Manuel Carmona Salgado1, Eduardo Espejo Maldonado, Miguel Tallada Buñuel
1Servicio de Ginecología y Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, España. macarsal@hotmail.com
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
|February 5, 2003
Summary
Pelvic floor examination findings are complex to classify for proper treatment. A systematic approach and multidisciplinary care are key to addressing pelvic floor dysfunction.
Area of Science:
- Urogynecology
- Pelvic Floor Disorders
- Anatomical Classification
Context:
- Pelvic floor examination is crucial for diagnosing and treating pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
- Current classification systems for POP present challenges in standardization and clinical application.
- Accurate assessment is vital for effective therapeutic strategies.
Purpose:
- To standardize pelvic floor examination findings for clear communication and treatment indication.
- To review existing classifications and the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) system.
- To propose a systematic examination protocol for pelvic floor defects.
Summary:
- This study reviews classic and current classifications of genital prolapse, including the POPQ system.
- It outlines a systematic pelvic floor examination approach, assessing anterior, central, and posterior compartments, along with pelvic floor descent and muscle function.
- The evaluation aims to simplify the complex diagnosis of pelvic floor defects.
Impact:
- A systematic examination and multidisciplinary approach can improve the management of pelvic floor dysfunction.
- Standardized reporting of pelvic floor examination findings facilitates better patient care and treatment planning.
- Improved understanding of pelvic floor anatomy and defects aids in achieving optimal treatment outcomes.