Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive control processes during an anticipated switch of task.

G R Wylie1, D C Javitt, J J Foxe

  • 1The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Program in Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, 140 Old Orangeburg Road, New York 10962, USA.

The European Journal of Neuroscience
|February 13, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The differential effect of chronological age and brain age on cognitive fatigue: new metrics, new insights.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Validation of a suite of ERP and QEEG biomarkers in a pre-competitive, industry-led study in subjects with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers.

Schizophrenia research·2023
Same author

Cognitive fatigue in traumatic brain injury: a pilot study comparing state and trait fatigue.

Brain injury·2021
Same author

Substance use patterns in 9-10 year olds: Baseline findings from the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2021
Same author

Baseline brain function in the preadolescents of the ABCD Study.

Nature neuroscience·2021
Same author

Using functional connectivity changes associated with cognitive fatigue to delineate a fatigue network.

Scientific reports·2020
Same journal

Hyperthyroidism Is Genetically Associated With Reduced Risk of Parkinson's Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

How Precise Is Predictive Coding for Things We Hear? Mismatch Negativity With Shepard Tones.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Can Neuroscience Inform Peacebuilding?

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Game-Based Foreign-Language Speech Rehearsal Improves Pitch Processing Beyond Speech Domain.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Sleep Oscillations Across Cortical, Subcortical and Cerebellar Structures in Magnetoencephalography.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Freezing of Gait Levodopa Response Pattern in Parkinson's Disease Provides Clues to Pathophysiology.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Humans can switch tasks, but some switching processes occur only after the stimulus appears, not during preparation. This challenges existing models of executive control and task switching.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Task switching is crucial for environmental navigation and relies on executive control.
  • Despite research, the brain mechanisms underlying task switching remain unclear.
  • Behavioral studies reveal a persistent performance cost in task switching, even with preparation time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural basis of task switching and the timing of executive control processes.
  • To determine if task switching preparation fully resolves performance costs.
  • To propose a new model for executive control in task switching.

Main Methods:

  • High-density mapping of brain potentials (EEG) was used to analyze neural activity.
  • Behavioral data on task performance and preparation time were collected.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Early visual processing differences between switch and non-switch trials were examined.

    • Main Results:

    • Early visual processing differs significantly between switch and non-switch trials.
    • Preparatory processes occur before a predictable task switch.
    • Some critical switching elements are only completed after the switch stimulus is presented.

    Conclusions:

    • Task switching involves both preparation and stimulus-driven processes.
    • Preparing to switch may initiate a competition between tasks, resolved upon stimulus presentation.
    • This challenges the view of preparation as a distinct, separate control process.