Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is the cerebellum a smith predictor?

R C Miall1, D J Weir, D M Wolpert

  • 1Oxford University, University Laboratory of Physiology, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT, U.K. rcm@uk.ac.ox.physiol

Journal of Motor Behavior
|September 1, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Motor imagery, forward models and the cerebellum: a commentary on Rieger et al., 2023.

Psychological research·2024
Same author

Exploration biases how forelimb reaches to a spatial target are learned.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2023
Same author

Modulation of linguistic prediction by TDCS of the right lateral cerebellum.

Neuropsychologia·2016
Same author

Identifying the causal mechanisms of the quiet eye.

European journal of sport science·2015
Same author

The influence of stimulus format on drawing--a functional imaging study of decision making in portrait drawing.

NeuroImage·2014
Same author

Genome-wide screening for DNA variants associated with reading and language traits.

Genes, brain, and behavior·2014
Same journal

Expertise Modulates Anticipatory Synergy Adjustments in a Rapid Motor Skill Under Temporal Constraints.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

A Boundary of Ideomotor Control: Semantic Labels Bias Selection but Do Not Tune Motor Execution.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Strategies When Choosing Between Movement Options in a Sequential Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Neurofunctional Motor Training in Autistic Children: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

Individualized Virtual Angle Offset Training for Patients with Stroke.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
Same journal

The Role of Exploratory Procedures in Perceiving Affordances in a Bimanual Wielding Task.

Journal of motor behavior·2026
See all related articles

The cerebellum may create internal predictive models, similar to a Smith Predictor, to improve motor control by anticipating movement consequences and time delays. This allows for faster error correction and learning in motor and non-motor functions.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Control Theory
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Motor control systems often rely on negative feedback mechanisms.
  • Internal predictive models offer a potential for superior motor control.
  • The cerebellum is hypothesized to play a role in generating these predictive representations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review theories on cerebellar predictive modeling.
  • To unify these theories using the Smith Predictor engineering control model.
  • To propose a dual-model system within the cerebellum for motor control.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing theories on cerebellar function in motor control.
  • Application of the Smith Predictor control model to cerebellar function.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of evidence supporting cerebellar internal models.
  • Main Results:

    • The cerebellum likely forms two internal models: a forward predictive model of the motor apparatus and a model of time delays in the control loop.
    • These models enable prediction of sensory consequences and temporal alignment with feedback for error correction and learning.
    • Evidence suggests the cerebellum may implement at least two Smith Predictors, potentially in distinct regions (lateral and intermediate cerebellum).

    Conclusions:

    • The cerebellum's predictive capabilities can be understood through the lens of the Smith Predictor.
    • The cerebellum may utilize separate predictive models for different coordinate systems (visual/egocentric vs. motor).
    • The Smith Predictor framework may extend to non-motor cerebellar functions, including cognition and autonomic control.