Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

A Protocol for Analyzing Hepatitis C Virus Replication
Published on: June 26, 2014
Guidelines for laboratory testing and result reporting of antibody to hepatitis C virus. Centers for Disease Control
Miriam J Alter1, Wendi L Kuhnert, Lyn Finelli
1Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for Infectious Diseases, USA.
Insights
Accurate hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing is crucial for patient care. New guidelines recommend using signal-to-cut-off ratios in supplemental testing to improve the reliability of anti-HCV results.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Immunology
- Public Health
Background:
- Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection identification relies on antibody testing.
- Current anti-HCV testing involves screening and supplemental assays, but practices vary, leading to inconsistent results.
- False positive screening tests can cause unnecessary patient distress and healthcare utilization.
Framework:
- Recommendations for anti-HCV testing are updated to include reflex supplemental testing.
- Utilizing signal-to-cut-off (s/co) ratios for reflex testing is proposed.
- This approach aims to optimize supplemental testing and enhance result accuracy.
Implementation:
- Laboratories performing in vitro diagnostic anti-HCV testing should adopt these guidelines.
- The guidelines were developed by CDC in consultation with FDA and laboratory representatives.
- Implementation will standardize anti-HCV testing protocols across public and private laboratories.
Implications:
- Improved accuracy and utility of reported anti-HCV test results.
- Enhanced patient counseling, medical evaluation, and targeted interventions for confirmed HCV cases.
- Better public health surveillance for hepatitis C virus infection.
Abstract:
Testing for the presence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) is recommended for initially identifying persons with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (CDC. Recommendations for prevention and control of hepatitis C virus [HCV] infection and HCV-related chronic disease. MMWR 1998;47[No. RR-19] :1-33). Testing for anti-HCV should include use of an antibody screening assay, and for screening test-positive results, a more specific supplemental assay. Verifying the presence of anti-HCV minimizes unnecessary medical visits and psychological harm for persons who test falsely positive by screening assays and ensures that counseling, medical referral, and evaluation are targeted for patients serologically confirmed as having been infected with HCV. However, substantial variation in reflex supplemental testing practices exists among laboratories, and an anti-HCV-positive laboratory report does not uniformly represent a confirmed positive result. These guidelines expand recommendations for anti-HCV testing to include an option for reflex supplemental testing based on screening-test-positive signal-to-cut-off (s/co) ratios. Use of s/co ratios minimizes the amount of supplemental testing that needs to be performed while improving the reliability of reported test results. These guidelines were developed on the basis of available knowledge of CDC staff in consultation with representatives from the Food and Drug Administration and public health, hospital, and independent laboratories. Adoption of these guidelines by all public and private laboratories that perform in vitro diagnostic anti-HCV testing will improve the accuracy and utility of reported anti-HCV test results for counseling and medical evaluation of patients by health-care professionals and for surveillance by public health departments.
Related Concept Videos
Hepatitis
Viral Hepatitis I: Introduction

