Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reviewing evidence.

Jaqui Hewitt-Taylor1

  • 1Distance Learning Centre, South Bank University, London, UK. jcdeht@yahoo.co.uk

Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
|February 20, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study defines evidence-based practice and outlines systematic review steps. It discusses integrating evidence, clinical expertise, and client choice for optimal healthcare outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of a research-based classification of approaches to paediatric palliative medicine service provision within children's and young adults' hospices: A mixed methods study.

Palliative medicine·2022
Same author

"His tummy's only tiny" - Scientific feeding advice versus women's knowledge. Women's experiences of feeding their late preterm babies.

Midwifery·2018
Same author

Using the Internet as a source of information and support: a discussion paper on the risks and benefits for children and young people with long-term conditions.

Journal of innovation in health informatics·2015
Same author

Vulnerability and risk in children living with a physical disability.

Nursing children and young people·2014
Same author

Family-focused children's end of life care in hospital and at home.

Nursing children and young people·2014
Same author

How people with diabetes integrate self-monitoring of blood glucose into their self-management strategies.

Informatics in primary care·2014
Same journal

The use of the modified Dutch worry criteria, combined with vital signs and early warning scores, to improve nurses' recognition and escalation of ward deteriorating patients: A prospective cross-sectional observation multi-method study.

Intensive & critical care nursing·2026
Same journal

An exploration of the use of safety huddles in ICUs across the United Kingdom - A cross-sectional national e-survey.

Intensive & critical care nursing·2026
Same journal

Research integrity throughout the research lifecycle and stakeholders: Part 3 - From data analysis to post-publication.

Intensive & critical care nursing·2026
Same journal

Physical function at ICU discharge: A marker of risk or a target for intervention?

Intensive & critical care nursing·2026
Same journal

Competence is not enough: organisational readiness for safe ECMO nursing care.

Intensive & critical care nursing·2026
Same journal

Alarms and alarm management with automated versus conventional ventilation in neurocritical care patients.

Intensive & critical care nursing·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Research
  • Evidence-Based Practice
  • Clinical Decision-Making

Background:

  • Defining evidence-based practice is crucial for healthcare quality.
  • Understanding the scope of evidence is essential for its application.
  • Systematic reviews are key to synthesizing research findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define evidence-based practice and its components.
  • To outline the methodology for conducting systematic reviews.
  • To address challenges in implementing evidence into clinical practice.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on evidence-based practice definitions.
  • Description of systematic review steps.
  • Analysis of implementation barriers and facilitators.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Evidence-based practice integrates research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences.
  • Systematic reviews involve defined stages from question formulation to synthesis.
  • Successful implementation requires addressing practical, organizational, and individual factors.

Conclusions:

  • Evidence-based practice is a framework for informed clinical decision-making.
  • Rigorous systematic reviews provide reliable evidence.
  • Integrating evidence with practice necessitates a multifaceted approach.