Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using benchmarking to manage your laboratory.

David S Wilkinson1, Deborah D Reynolds

  • 1Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Clinical Leadership & Management Review : the Journal of CLMA
|February 21, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selective laryngoscopy before thyroidectomy: a risk assessment.

ANZ journal of surgery·2022
Same author

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Oncology.

Therapeutic drug monitoring·2019
Same author

Clinical Utility of Genotyping Human Erythrocyte Antigens.

Laboratory medicine·2016
Same author

Documentation of quality control and operator training at point-of-care testing: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 106 institutions.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2014
Same author

Equivocal or ambiguous terminologies in pathology: focus of continuous quality improvement?

The American journal of surgical pathology·2013
Same author

Utilization of stat test priority in the clinical laboratory: a College of American Pathologists q-probes study of 52 institutions.

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine·2013
Same journal

Beware of unwritten institutional policies.

Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA·2007
Same journal

National initiatives impacting Canadian laboratories--part 1.

Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA·2007
Same journal

The acquisition of laboratory equipment.

Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA·2007
Same journal

Strategies for improving employee retention.

Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA·2007
Same journal

Guidelines for implementing automation in a hospital laboratory setting--part II.

Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA·2007
Same journal

Blood management: a model of excellence.

Clinical leadership & management review : the journal of CLMA·2007
See all related articles

Benchmarking laboratory operations provides crucial data for comparison and improvement. Virginia Commonwealth University Health System

Area of Science:

  • Laboratory operations management
  • Healthcare administration
  • Clinical pathology services

Background:

  • Healthcare organizations face increasing pressure to optimize operational efficiency.
  • Benchmarking is a valuable tool for assessing performance against industry standards.
  • Laboratory departments must continually evaluate cost per test and productivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the critical role of benchmarking in laboratory management.
  • To highlight how data-driven comparisons can lead to significant operational improvements.
  • To illustrate the impact of benchmarking on financial viability and resource allocation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing benchmarking data to compare laboratory operations with best performers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing key performance indicators such as cost per test and productivity.
  • Implementing strategies based on benchmarking insights.

    • Main Results:

    • Benchmarking provided critical answers regarding cost per test and productivity.
    • The Virginia Commonwealth University Health System (VCUHS) Pathology Department identified areas for improvement.
    • Strategic application of benchmarking data led to substantial positive changes, saving the laboratory.

    Conclusions:

    • Benchmarking is an essential, actionable strategy for laboratory improvement, not merely a data exercise.
    • Clarification, consistency, and communication are key elements for successful benchmarking implementation.
    • Effective benchmarking can be crucial for laboratory survival, especially during budget constraints.