Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia.

V Wiseman1, G Mooney, G Berry

  • 1Gates Malaria Partnership and the Health Policy Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 50 Bedford Square, WC1B 3DP, London, UK. virginia.wiseman@lshtm.ac.uk

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|February 21, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

2021 Canadian Surgery Forum: Virtual, online Sept. 21-24, 2021.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

Current level of technology use, health and eHealth literacy in older Canadians with a recent fracture-a survey in orthopedic clinics.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020
Same author

[Establish a predictive modeling under antiviral therapy for hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in chronic hepatitis B].

Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology·2018
Same author

Banff Lung Report: Current knowledge and future research perspectives for diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2018
Same author

The Evolution of School Health and Nutrition in the Education Sector 2000-2015 in sub-Saharan Africa.

Frontiers in public health·2017
Same author

Choose wisely.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2016
Same journal

When the platform becomes a co-author: Self-writing about HPV vaccination on social media as technologies of the self.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Erratum to "Defensive decoupling: Tensions and contradictions in a US surgical safety intervention" [Soc. Sci. Med. 403 (2026) 119421].

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Eating disorder severity and treatment outcome across race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status: Intersectional inequities in a clinical sample.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Syndemic interactions in northwest Italy: education, place of birth, and the co-occurrence of type 2 diabetes and depression.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

Institutional social isolation and preventive health check-up attendance among public assistance recipients in Japan: A qualitative dominant mixed-methods study.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
Same journal

"Beyond the state: First-person ethics and the governance of targeted therapies in China".

Social science & medicine (1982)·2026
See all related articles

The public wants their preferences to guide health care priority setting, especially for broad programs and fund allocation. However, they believe decisions should incorporate diverse stakeholder input, not just public opinion.

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Debate exists on public involvement in health care priority setting.
  • Citizen perspectives are often excluded from this debate.
  • Understanding public willingness to participate is crucial for legitimate health policy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey citizens on their role in health care priority setting.
  • To explore public preferences across different priority-setting levels.
  • To assess public views on incorporating diverse stakeholder preferences.

Main Methods:

  • Survey of 373 citizens at two Sydney medical clinics.
  • Presentation of three priority-setting levels: programs, procedures, global.
  • Inclusion of funding and cost-effectiveness data to inform choices.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Public overwhelmingly desires input in health care priority setting.
  • Public preferences are highly valued for program-level and fund allocation decisions.
  • Medical professionals' preferences are prioritized for treatment-level decisions.
  • Citizens advocate for multi-stakeholder input, not solely public opinion.
  • Politicians' preferences were deemed least important.

Conclusions:

  • Citizens strongly support a role in health care priority setting.
  • Public preferences are key for macro-level health policy decisions.
  • Effective priority setting requires integrating diverse stakeholder perspectives.