Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual differences in sentence memory.

Rose Roberts1, Edward Gibson

  • 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, NE20-459, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.

Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
|February 26, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dependency syntax as the simplest theory of grammar.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Three distinct components of pragmatic language use: Social conventions, intonation, and world knowledge-based causal reasoning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

The Relationship Between Surprisal and Prosodic Prominence in Conversation Reflects Intelligibility-Oriented Pressures.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

Decoding the implausible: Mandarin sentence interpretation through the noisy channel model.

Memory & cognition·2025
Same author

The Influence of Prior Semantic Knowledge in Noisy Channel Interpretation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Syntactic Complexity Phenomena Are Better Explained Without Empty Elements Mediating Long-Distance Dependencies.

Cognitive science·2025
Same journal

Cognitive Individual Differences in Multilingualism: Language Aptitude and Working Memory in L3 Learners.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same journal

Grasp Motor Representations Facilitate Conceptual Preparation in Speech Production.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same journal

The Lexical Tone Partially Depends on Segments: Evidence from Visual-World Eye Tracking.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same journal

Unearthing Perfectionism and L2 Speaking Performance among Iranian EFL Learners: The Moderating Role of Cultural Collectivism.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same journal

Child Bilingual Acquisition of Spanish Dative (Non-)clitic Doubling Structures: A Case Study Approach to Home and Community Input Conditions.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
Same journal

Using Eye Tracking to Examine Effects of Overt Localization on Referential Processing in German Sign Language Sentence Processing.

Journal of psycholinguistic research·2026
See all related articles

Sentence memory relies on clauses and multiple working memory components, not just linguistic experience. This research highlights the complex nature of sentence comprehension and recall.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics

Background:

  • Sentence memory is crucial for language comprehension.
  • Understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying sentence memory is an ongoing research area.
  • Working memory's role in sentence processing is complex and not fully elucidated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the fundamental unit of representation in sentence memory.
  • To examine the relationship between working memory capacity and sentence memory performance.
  • To determine if sentence memory relies on a single or multiple working memory components.

Main Methods:

  • Participants processed sentences of varying clause lengths (2-5 clauses) and answered comprehension questions.
  • Working memory capacity was assessed using a composite complex span score (based on Daneman & Carpenter's reading span task) and the N-back task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Correlational analyses were performed between sentence memory performance and working memory measures.

    • Main Results:

    • Sentence memory performance was significantly correlated with the complex span score.
    • Sentence memory performance was also significantly correlated with the N-back task.
    • No significant correlation was found between the complex span task and the N-back task, suggesting dissociable components.

    Conclusions:

    • The clause is a key unit of representation in sentence memory.
    • Sentence memory involves multiple, dissociable components of working memory.
    • Working memory, rather than solely linguistic experience, significantly contributes to sentence memory.
    • These findings suggest that sentence memory is supported by distinct cognitive resources within working memory.