Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing supervised and unsupervised category learning.

Bradley C Love1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA. love@psy.utexas.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|March 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distinct Hippocampal Mechanisms Support Concept Formation and Updating.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Confidence-weighted integration of human and machine judgments for superior decision-making.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Adaptive stretching of representations across brain regions and deep learning model layers.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Coordinating multiple mental faculties during learning.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Demystifying unsupervised learning: how it helps and hurts.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2024
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Unsupervised learning, especially incidental, favors linear structures over nonlinear ones, unlike supervised learning. Intentional unsupervised learning is rule-like but not more accurate or efficient.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Unsupervised learning is crucial for understanding how humans learn without explicit feedback.
  • Seminal studies by Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) provide a foundation for supervised classification learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine two unsupervised learning modes: incidental and intentional.
  • To compare unsupervised learning data with established supervised classification learning studies.
  • To investigate the relationship between unsupervised and supervised learning.

Main Methods:

  • Direct comparison of unsupervised learning data with historical supervised learning data.
  • Analysis of performance variations under different task conditions for unsupervised learning.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Unsupervised learning, particularly incidental, shows a preference for linear category structures over nonlinear ones.
  • Intentional unsupervised learning exhibits rule-like behavior but does not improve accuracy.
  • Knowledge acquisition and application are more effortful in intentional unsupervised learning.

Conclusions:

  • Unsupervised learning is a complex process influenced by task conditions.
  • The findings highlight key differences in category structure preferences between unsupervised and supervised learning.
  • Intentional unsupervised learning, while structured, offers no performance advantage over incidental learning.