Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

An Approach to Point-Of-Care Ultrasound Evaluation of the Abdominal Aorta
Published on: September 8, 2023
Imaging in acute abdomen
Daya Shankar Mishra1, Sarita Magu, Namita Sharma
1Department of Radiology, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Insights
Ultrasound (US) is a valuable tool for diagnosing pediatric acute abdomen, showing high accuracy for intussusception and appendicitis. While effective, US has limitations in identifying causes of intestinal obstruction like congenital bands.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Radiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Abdominal Emergencies
Background:
- Acute abdomen in children presents a diagnostic challenge.
- Imaging modalities play a crucial role in identifying the underlying cause.
- Ultrasound (US) is increasingly utilized in pediatric emergency settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define the precise role of ultrasound in diagnosing pediatric acute abdomen.
- To identify the limitations of ultrasound in this clinical context.
Main Methods:
- A study evaluated 50 children under 14 years with acute abdomen using ultrasound and other imaging.
- Specific diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, predictive values) were calculated for conditions like intussusception and appendicitis.
Main Results:
- Ultrasound demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for intussusception (88.2%, 100%) and appendicitis (91.6%, 97%).
- Overall sensitivity for diagnosing specific causes of acute abdomen was 77.5%.
- Limitations were noted in diagnosing acute intestinal obstruction due to congenital bands and adhesions.
Conclusions:
- Ultrasound is recommended as the primary imaging modality for pediatric acute abdomen.
- Plain radiography, contrast studies, and CT may be necessary for definitive diagnosis in complex cases.
Objective:
The present study aims at establishing the exact role and limitation of ultrasound in pediatric acute abdomen.
Methods:
Fifty children less than 14 years of age presenting with acute abdomen were evaluated by US and other imaging modalities. The mean age of presentation was 3 1/2 years. Maximum number of cases were seen in less than two years of age. There were 17 cases of intussusception with US sensitivity and specificity of 88.2% and 100% respectively and positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 94.5% respectively. There were 13 cases of appendicitis. US was diagnostic in 11 with sensitivity and specificity of 91.6% and 97%; the positive and negative predictive values were 91.6% and 97% respectively.
Results:
There were two cases each of congenital bands, adhesive intestinal obstruction, malrotation of bowel with volvulus, incarcerated inguinal hernia, hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, duplication cyst and pseudopancreatic cyst, one case each of trichobezoar, Meckel's diverticulum, ureteric calculus and worms as a cause of intestinal obstruction. The sensitivity of US for diagnosing specific cause of acute abdomen was found to be 77.5%. The main limitation of US was in the diagnosis of acute intestinal obstruction such as congenital bands and adhesions.
Conclusion:
US should now be considered as imaging modality of choice in pediatric acute abdomen. However, at times, plain radiography, conventional contrast studies and CT may be vital to reach the true diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
X-ray Imaging