Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The double pocket technique: aesthetic breast augmentation.

Gonzalo Bosch1, Oscar Jacobo

  • 1gbosch@netgate.com.uy

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
|March 7, 2003
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new breast augmentation technique called the double pocket method. Instead of placing implants in just one area—either under the breast tissue or under the chest muscle—the procedure uses both spaces at once. The implants are placed on both sides of the pectoral muscle, connected by a small muscle buttonhole. This approach aims to increase breast volume, improve shape, and enhance projection, while avoiding the drawbacks of traditional methods. The authors describe the surgical steps and initial outcomes, suggesting that the double pocket technique may offer a more versatile option for breast augmentation. The results indicate that the method could reduce implant visibility and improve aesthetic outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Nipple invagination: the umbrella effect.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2007
Same author

The extended brow lift: the toucan technique.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2002
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Plastic surgery techniques
  • Breast augmentation outcomes
  • Surgical anatomy in reconstructive surgery

Background:

Breast augmentation procedures have long involved decisions about implant placement relative to the pectoral muscle. For over 25 years, the debate has centered on whether implants should be placed subglandularly or subpectorally. Prior research has shown that each approach has distinct aesthetic and functional outcomes. Subglandular placement can offer more natural-looking projection but may increase visibility of implant edges. Subpectoral placement often reduces rippling but can alter the chest contour. No prior work had resolved the trade-offs between these two approaches. This gap motivated the development of alternative techniques that could combine the benefits of both. The anatomical complexity of the breast has limited the adoption of hybrid methods. Surgeons have sought ways to maximize volume and shape while minimizing complications. The need for a more versatile implant pocket became evident in clinical practice.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this work was to develop a new implant placement technique that could simultaneously utilize both subglandular and subpectoral spaces. The specific problem addressed was the lack of a single pocket that could enhance volume, shape, and projection without the drawbacks of either traditional approach. The motivation came from clinical observations that neither subglandular nor subpectoral placement alone fully met aesthetic goals. The authors sought to create a pocket that would allow implants to be positioned in two anatomical regions at once. This approach was intended to improve implant positioning and reduce complications. The study focused on the anatomical feasibility of such a technique. The goal was to test whether a double pocket could be safely and effectively created. The authors aimed to describe the surgical steps and initial outcomes of this method.

Keywords:
breast augmentation techniquesimplant placement methodssurgical anatomyaesthetic breast surgery

Frequently Asked Questions

The double pocket technique involves placing implants in both subglandular and subpectoral spaces simultaneously, using a muscle buttonhole to connect the two pockets.

Unlike traditional methods, the double pocket technique uses both anatomical spaces to enhance volume, shape, and projection while reducing implant visibility.

The muscle buttonhole connects the subglandular and subpectoral pockets, allowing implants to be placed in both regions without disrupting the pectoral muscle.

Patients experienced improved breast volume, projection, and shape, with reduced implant visibility and fewer complications compared to traditional methods.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The procedure involved identifying the virtual spaces within the breast anatomy that could accommodate implants in both subglandular and subpectoral regions. The surgical approach utilized a muscle buttonhole technique to connect the two pockets. The implant was placed in a double pocket on both sides of the pectoral muscle. The technique required careful dissection to avoid damaging the muscle or glandular tissue. The authors described the use of a gentle muscle buttonhole to join the two pockets. The procedure was performed bilaterally to ensure symmetry. The surgical steps were designed to minimize tissue trauma and preserve anatomical landmarks. The method was based on anatomical observations from prior surgical experience.

Main Results:

The double pocket technique allowed implants to be placed in both subglandular and subpectoral spaces simultaneously. The procedure increased breast volume and improved projection without visible implant edges. The authors reported enhanced shape and contour in patients who underwent the technique. The muscle buttonhole technique facilitated implant positioning and reduced complications. The results suggested that the double pocket could offer advantages over traditional methods. The procedure was associated with minimal tissue disruption and preserved anatomical structures. The authors observed improved aesthetic outcomes compared to single-pocket placements. The technique demonstrated potential for broader clinical application.

Conclusions:

The authors concluded that the double pocket technique offers a viable alternative to traditional implant placement methods. The procedure combines the benefits of subglandular and subpectoral pockets to enhance aesthetic outcomes. The technique was found to improve volume, shape, and projection while reducing complications. The authors proposed that the double pocket could be used in a variety of breast augmentation cases. The results suggest that the method may be particularly useful in achieving natural-looking results. The authors emphasized the importance of anatomical knowledge in performing the technique. The findings indicate that the double pocket approach may be a valuable addition to surgical options. The authors suggest further study to confirm the long-term outcomes of the procedure.

The technique requires precise dissection to preserve anatomical landmarks and avoid damage to the pectoral muscle or glandular tissue.

The authors suggest that the double pocket technique may offer a valuable alternative to traditional implant placement methods for achieving natural-looking results.