Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Differentiating quality improvement from research.

Anita C Reinhardt¹, Leslie N Ray

¹School of Nursing at Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Applied Nursing Research : ANR

|March 8, 2003

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A Qualitative Inquiry Exploring Clinical Faculty Transition to a Concept-Based Curriculum.

Nursing education perspectives·2023

Same author

Why nurses stay: Analysis of the registered nurse workforce and the relationship to work environments.

Applied nursing research : ANR·2020

Same author

Using simulations to advance clinical reasoning.

Applied nursing research : ANR·2019

Same author

Charting Cognitive Growth of Nursing Students Using Linguistic Software.

Nurse educator·2019

Same author

Strategies for success: crisis management model for remediation of at-risk students.

The Journal of nursing education·2012

Same author

The impact of work environment on telephone advice nursing.

Clinical nursing research·2010

Same journal

We face a critical gap in nursing intervention research - and the scientists prepared to conduct it.

Applied nursing research : ANR·2026

Same journal

The association between nurse managers' toxic leadership behaviors and nurses' work flourishing from dual perspectives: The mediating role of occupational burnout.

Applied nursing research : ANR·2026

Same journal

Work-family conflict and coping strategies as predictors of emotional exhaustion in nurses.

Applied nursing research : ANR·2026

Same journal

Effect of nursing interventions on self-care for ostomy patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Applied nursing research : ANR·2026

Same journal

A quasi-experimental evaluation of a psychological support communication training program on nurse competencies and ward-level patient-reported outcomes.

Applied nursing research : ANR·2026

Same journal

Knowledge and practice gaps in delirium care among ICU nurses: A multicenter study in Jordan.

Applied nursing research : ANR·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Quality improvement (QI) projects and clinical research share methods, causing confusion. This review clarifies differences using four criteria: intervention, risk, audience, and data source, aiding appropriate project review.

Area of Science:

Healthcare quality management
Clinical research methodology

Background:

Healthcare quality monitoring is crucial for patient safety and meeting standards.
Similarities between quality improvement (QI) projects and clinical research methods cause confusion in practice.
Differentiating QI from research is essential for appropriate procedural review.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the literature and delineate the distinctions between quality improvement (QI) and clinical research.
To identify and discuss key criteria for differentiating QI projects from research studies.
To guide investigators in selecting the correct procedures for project review.

Main Methods:

Literature review of current scientific articles comparing QI and research.
Identification and analysis of four key differentiating criteria: intervention, risk, audience, and data source.

Related Experiment Videos

Discussion of the implications of these criteria for regulatory and ethical review processes.

Main Results:

QI projects typically focus on improving existing processes within a specific setting.
Clinical research aims to generate generalizable knowledge, often involving higher risk and distinct data sources.
The four identified criteria (intervention, risk, audience, data source) provide a framework for distinguishing between the two.

Conclusions:

Clear differentiation between QI and research is necessary for compliance and ethical conduct.
The proposed criteria offer a practical approach for investigators and review boards.
Accurate classification ensures that projects undergo the appropriate review and oversight mechanisms.