Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does phase cycling work for nuclei experiencing strong quadrupolar couplings?

Philip J Grandinetti1

  • 1Department of Chemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1173, USA. grandinetti.l@osu.edu

Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
|March 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiple-quantum magic-angle spinning NMR spectra in the static limit: The I = 3/2 case.

The Journal of chemical physics·2024
Same author

Refining siliceous zeolite framework structures with <sup>29</sup>Si 2D <i>J</i>-resolved NMR spectroscopy.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2024
Same author

MRSimulator: A cross-platform, object-oriented software package for rapid solid-state NMR spectral simulation and analysis.

The Journal of chemical physics·2024
Same author

Simulating multipulse NMR spectra of polycrystalline solids in the frequency domain.

The Journal of chemical physics·2024
Same author

Rapid simulation of two-dimensional spectra with correlated anisotropic dimensions.

The Journal of chemical physics·2024
Same author

Silicon-29 echo train coherence lifetimes and geminal <sup>2</sup>J-couplings in network modified silicate glasses.

Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)·2021
Same journal

Experimental and computational <sup>11</sup>B NMR comparative study of MOVPE-grown rhombohedral and bulk hexagonal boron nitride.

Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance·2026
Same journal

Determination of <sup>137</sup>Ba nuclear quadrupole interactions in solids: a comparison of high field and zero field approaches.

Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance·2026
Same journal

Probing interlayer bromide in solvent intercalation of layered yttrium hydroxide via <sup>79/81</sup>Br SSNMR spectroscopy.

Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance·2026
Same journal

Single crystal sapphire spacers for in situ angle sensing and rotor stability diagnostics in MAS NMR.

Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance·2026
Same journal

Insights into the local adsorption of CO<sub>2</sub> in UiO-66.

Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance·2026
Same journal

<sup>75</sup>As NQR characterisation of cobaltite (CoAsS).

Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance·2026
See all related articles

Phase cycling remains effective for selecting coherence transfer pathways in spin systems, even with tilted eigenstates due to strong couplings. Pathway efficiencies may change, impacting signal detection.

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  • Quantum Spin Dynamics

Background:

  • Spin systems often exhibit eigenstates aligned with the Zeeman field.
  • Strong couplings can cause eigenstates to tilt away from this alignment.
  • Coherence transfer pathways are crucial for signal selection in spectroscopy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To theoretically investigate the validity of phase cycling for coherence transfer pathway selection.
  • To determine if tilted eigenstates affect the efficacy of conventional phase cycling methods.
  • To analyze the impact of eigenstate tilting on pathway efficiencies.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of spin systems with strong couplings.
  • Investigation of coherence transfer pathway selection using phase cycling.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of how tilted eigenstates influence excitation and detection mechanisms.

    • Main Results:

    • Phase cycling is confirmed as a valid method for selecting coherence transfer pathways.
    • Eigenstate tilting due to strong couplings does not invalidate phase cycling.
    • Significant changes in pathway efficiencies were observed due to altered excitation/detection.

    Conclusions:

    • Conventional phase cycling remains a robust technique for coherence transfer pathway selection.
    • The tilting of eigenstates necessitates careful consideration of pathway efficiencies.
    • Understanding these efficiency changes is key for accurate spectral interpretation.