[Permanent cardiac pacing for chronic symptomatic atrioventricular block in uremic hemodialysed patients. A...

Though sudden cardiac death accounts for as much as 15% of all cause mortality in uremia, reports concerning advanced A-V block, requiring permanent cardiac pacing in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) hemodialysed (HD) patients are very few. This is the first long term prospective study reporting on systematic permanent pacemaker implantation, in a cohort of ESRD patients from a single HD unit. Between 01/06/1997 and 30/12/2001, 396 pacemakers were inserted for advanced, symptomatic A-V block in our institution, including 5 in ESRD, HD patients (M/F--4/1, age 47-73, M +/- SD--61 +/- 12 years) from a single dialysis center, treating 137 patients during the study period. Thus, the incidence and prevalence of A-V defects treated by permanent pacing in uremic patients was 0.81% and 3.65% respectively. Conversely, the incidence and prevalence of ESRD treated by hemodialysis, among patients with advanced A-V conduction disturbances, requiring permanent pacing were 0.28% and 1.26%. Mitral valve calcifications were present in all patients; 3 subjects also had extensive aortic valve calcifications. Left ventricular hypertrophy (echocardiographic Framingham criteria) was present in 4 patients, but the systolic function (ejection fraction and fractional shortening index) was normal in all cases, although a clinical picture of chronic heart failure was seen in 3 subjects preoperatively. A-V conduction defects were attributed to extensive metastatic calcifications, involving the cardiac squeleton, consecutive to severe hyperparathyroidism and inadvertent use of calcitriol and calcium carbonate as phosphate binders. No technical difficulties, short or long-term complications related to pacemaker implantation (4 VVI and 1 VVD devices) were encountered. Acute threshold and sensing values were similar with those of non-uremic patients. During follow-up, one patients died from a non cardiac death. If optimal hemodialysis is provided, benefits of permanent pacing are equal in uremic or non uremic patients and pacemaker implantation should be instituted as a prompt life-saving method in all dialysis patients with chronic symptomatic advanced A-V blocks.