Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
[Oral anticoagulation treatment--control, risks, benefits, and informed consent]
Paul Froom1, Doron Hermoni, Mira Barak
1Dept of Family Medicine, Technion Faculty of Medicine, and General Health Services, Haifa.
Insights
Warfarin therapy for atrial fibrillation, mechanical heart valves, and venous thromboembolism requires careful monitoring. Challenges in maintaining the International Normalized Ratio (INR) range and patient understanding of risks highlight the need for informed consent.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Context:
- Warfarin is a common anticoagulant for atrial fibrillation, mechanical heart valves, and venous thromboembolism.
- Current guidelines for warfarin therapy are well-established but challenging to implement.
- Maintaining the Prothrombin Time (PT) in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) therapeutic range is often difficult.
Purpose:
- To review current recommendations for long-term oral anticoagulant management.
- To identify challenges associated with PT-INR testing and interpretation.
- To emphasize the importance of informed consent in warfarin therapy.
Summary:
- Despite established guidelines, achieving and maintaining the target INR range for warfarin therapy presents significant clinical challenges.
- Physicians may underestimate the limitations of INR testing and the persistent risks of thromboembolic and bleeding events.
- This review addresses management recommendations, testing issues, urgent laboratory communication, and patient information for informed consent.
Impact:
- Highlights the gap between warfarin therapy guidelines and clinical practice.
- Underscores the medico-legal risks associated with suboptimal anticoagulation monitoring.
- Provides a framework for improving patient understanding and informed consent in warfarin management.
Abstract:
The most common indications for warfarin therapy are atrial fibrillation, the presence of a mechanical heart valve and venous thromboembolism. The risks and benefits of treatment for these conditions have been fairly well characterized and recent consensus groups have provided guidelines which are nearly identical. Although we can define the recommended range of the PT in INR units, it is often difficult under the best of circumstances to keep the INR in the desired range. Physicians often dont recognize the limitations of INR testing. Furthermore, the continued risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications despite state of the art treatment might not be recognized by the patient. This places the physician at risk of a malpractice suit and emphasizes the need for informed consent. The following review will summarize current recommendations for the major conditions requiring long-term management with oral anticoagulants, identify problems with PT-INR testing, consider when the laboratory should contact the physician urgently, define acceptable control of the PT-INR during audits, and finally suggest information for the patient, which might be used in an informed consent form.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

