Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MR imaging at high magnetic fields.

Masaya Takahashi1, Hidemasa Uematsu, Hiroto Hatabu

  • 1Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA. mtakahas@caregroup.harvard.edu

European Journal of Radiology
|March 22, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Paraseptal Emphysema and Interstitial Lung Abnormalities in AGES-Reykjavik Study.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2026
Same author

Age, sex, smoking-specific prevalence and progression in interstitial lung abnormality: patient-level meta-analysis.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2026
Same author

Diverse histopathological patterns in Fleischner-defined interstitial lung abnormalities: Radiologic-Pathologic correlation and reclassification using 2025 American Thoracic Society statement.

Respiratory investigation·2026
Same author

Prognostic impact of restrictive ventilatory defects in chronic lung allograft dysfunction without restrictive allograft syndrome-like opacities: Stratification of emerging undefined and unclassified phenotypes.

JHLT open·2026
Same author

Diaphragmatic curvature analysis using dynamic digital radiography.

European journal of radiology open·2025
Same author

Comprehensive radiologic-pathologic correlation in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: identification of an early-stage CT findings.

Japanese journal of radiology·2025

Higher magnetic field strengths (3-4 Tesla) offer improved MR imaging resolution and speed. Optimizing parameters is crucial for maximizing benefits and ensuring safety in clinical applications.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background:

  • Increasing use of 3-4 Tesla (T) magnetic field strengths in research and clinical settings.
  • Higher field strengths theoretically offer enhanced spatial resolution and reduced scan times due to increased signal intensity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate practical scientific applications of higher magnetic field strengths in Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging.
  • To discuss changes in MR imaging parameters and their effects at higher magnetic fields (3-4 T).
  • To outline requirements for maximizing benefits when transitioning from lower (< or = 1.5 T) to higher magnetic fields.

Main Methods:

  • Review of previous literature and experimental data concerning MR imaging at higher magnetic field strengths.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of magnetic field-dependent factors affecting signal and contrast-to-noise ratios.
  • Discussion of practical considerations including relaxation times, contrast agents, RF coil design, safety, and MR microscopy.

    • Main Results:

    • Higher magnetic fields introduce changes in signal intensity, relaxation times, and contrast agent effects.
    • Optimized imaging parameters are necessary to achieve desired signal and contrast-to-noise ratios at 3-4 T.
    • MR microscopy is a promising application with potential benefits at high magnetic fields.

    Conclusions:

    • A comprehensive understanding of combined magnetic field effects is essential for evaluating the utility of higher field strengths.
    • Careful consideration of parameter adjustments, coil design, safety, and specific applications like MR microscopy is needed to leverage 3-4 T MR imaging effectively.
    • Establishing practical imaging protocols requires quantitative estimation of benefits and addressing field-dependent challenges.