Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informational masking caused by contralateral stimulation.

Gerald Kidd1, Christine R Mason, Tanya L Arbogast

  • 1Hearing Research Center, Sargent College, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02132, USA. gkidd@bu.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|March 27, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining the Role of Pre-Operative Retrolisthesis in Single-Level Lumbar Fusion: Impact on Reoperation Rates.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Salvage Posterior C1-C2 Fusion for Odontoid Nonunion After Failed Nonoperative Management: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison with Primary Fusion.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Electroacoustic validation of a neck-based field attenuation estimation system.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Impaired Tone-in-Noise Detection in Individuals Who Report Temporary Hearing Symptoms After Noise Exposure.

Ear and hearing·2026
Same author

Improving Sensitivity of Tinnitus Screening in Hearing Conservation Programs.

Military medicine·2026
Same author

Personal attenuation rating as an indicator of audiometric threshold shifts.

International journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Contralateral masking, where sounds in one ear interfere with hearing in the other, can significantly impact auditory perception. This study shows this effect is not limited to speech and suggests general processing capacity limits.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Human Auditory Perception

Background:

  • Informational masking (IM) typically involves central auditory mechanisms.
  • Previous research shows IM effects are stronger with same-ear (ipsilateral) presentation than different-ear (contralateral).
  • Speech maskers presented contralaterally can cause significant IM when combined with an ipsilateral masker.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate contralateral informational masking using pure-tone signals and multitone maskers.
  • To determine if contralateral masking effects extend beyond speech stimuli.
  • To explore the influence of spectrotemporal masker patterns on contralateral masking.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments used a pure-tone signal and multitone informational maskers in a detection task.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Maskers were presented in sequences of short bursts.
  • Two masker patterns were used: multiple-bursts same (MBS) and multiple-bursts different (MBD).
  • Conditions included ipsilateral, contralateral, and combined masker presentations.

    • Main Results:

    • A substantial amount of informational masking occurred when the MBS masker was presented contralaterally alongside an ipsilateral MBD masker.
    • Listeners showed difficulty selectively attending to one ear in complex dichotic conditions.
    • The contralateral masking effect was observed with non-speech stimuli, suggesting general processing limitations.

    Conclusions:

    • Contralateral masking effects are not exclusive to speech and may indicate broader limitations in auditory processing capacity.
    • The magnitude of contralateral masking depends on the masker's informational masking value and the complexity of the ipsilateral task.
    • Findings support the idea that attentional focus across ears is limited in certain complex auditory scenarios.