Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Guidelines for assessments: reactions to the commentators.

J L Werth1, T Farrenkopf, G A H Benjamin

  • 1Department of Psychology, Third Floor, Polsky Building, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325-4301, USA. jwerth@uakron.edu

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law : an Official Law Review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law
|March 28, 2003
PubMed
Summary

This article addresses critiques of original guidelines, clarifying agreements and disagreements to advance scientific discussion. It synthesizes expert feedback for improved future research and practice.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychological consultation under Oregon's 1994 Death With Dignity Act: ethics and procedures.

Professional psychology, research and practice·2003
Same author

Observations on the first year of Oregon's Death with Dignity Act.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2003
Same author

A continued debate about hastened death.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2003
Same author

The first year of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act: responses to the commentators.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2003
Same author

Requests for physician-assisted death: guidelines for assessing mental capacity and impaired judgment.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2003
Same author

How do the mental health issues differ in the withholding/withdrawing of treatment versus assisted death?

Omega·2003

Area of Science:

  • Scientific publishing
  • Academic discourse

Background:

  • The original "Guidelines" article faced critiques from four commentators.
  • A need exists to synthesize diverse perspectives on the guidelines.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To respond to critiques of the original "Guidelines" article.
  • To identify areas of consensus and divergence among commentators.
  • To facilitate forward movement in the scientific discussion.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of commentator critiques.
  • Comparative review of original guidelines and feedback.
  • Synthesis of points of agreement and disagreement.

Main Results:

  • Key areas of agreement with commentators identified.
Keywords:
Death and EuthanasiaDeath with Dignity Act (Oregon)

Related Experiment Videos

  • Specific points of disagreement are highlighted.
  • A path for continued dialogue is proposed.

    • Conclusions:

    • Constructive engagement with critiques can refine scientific guidelines.
    • Addressing disagreements is crucial for advancing the field.
    • This response aims to foster collaborative progress.