Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological issues in assisted suicide and euthanasia research.

B Rosenfeld1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Fordham University, 441 East Fordham Road, Bronx, New York 10458, USA. rosenfeld@fordham.edu

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law : an Official Law Review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law
|March 29, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Depression in adolescents and multiculturality : a multifactorial analysis of psychological suffering inside a family in crisis].

Revue medicale de Bruxelles·2018
Same author

Multidimensional Representation of Decision-making in Chronic Schizophrenics.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

HIV/AIDS-related pain as a chronic pain condition: implications of a biopsychosocial model for comprehensive assessment and effective management.

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)·2004
Same author

Assessing competence to make treatment decisions.

Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998)·2004
Same author

Have we forgotten the base rate problem? Methodological issues in the detection of distortion.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2003
Same author

Assisted suicide, depression, and the right to die.

Psychology, public policy, and law : an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law·2003

This review identifies critical methodological flaws in assisted suicide and euthanasia research. Addressing these limitations is crucial for accurate interpretation and future studies on end-of-life choices.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Sociology of Health
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Extensive research exists on assisted suicide and euthanasia.
  • Existing literature suffers from significant methodological limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and categorize primary methodological issues in suicide and euthanasia research.
  • To discuss implications for result interpretation and offer solutions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focusing on methodological critiques.
  • Categorization of identified issues into broad themes.
  • Analysis of implications and potential solutions.

Main Results:

  • Key issues include problems with operationalizing variables, sampling biases, confounding factors, and statistical challenges.
Keywords:
Death and EuthanasiaEmpirical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • These limitations impact the reliability and validity of current research findings.

    • Conclusions:

    • Methodological rigor is essential for advancing the understanding of assisted suicide and euthanasia.
    • Recommendations are provided for improving future research design and analysis.