Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Michael Tombu1, Pierre Jolicoeur

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. mt2tombu@cgl.uwaterloo.ca

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|April 3, 2003
PubMed
Summary

The central capacity sharing (CCS) model explains dual-task performance, predicting psychological refractory period (PRP) effects. This model offers a viable alternative to the central bottleneck model for understanding task interference.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Are aggressive people able to integrate mitigating information into their hostile intent attribution? An ERP study.

Biological psychology·2025
Same author

The influence of social knowledge structures on hostile attribution bias in aggressive and nonaggressive individuals: An ERP study.

Neuropsychologia·2024
Same author

Theta oscillations linked to auditory informativeness and context disambiguation.

Neuroreport·2024
Same author

Pain reflects the informational value of nociceptive inputs.

Pain·2024
Same author

Difficulty suppressing visual distraction while dual tasking.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same author

Task-irrelevant filler items alter the dynamics of electrical brain activity during visual search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2022

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Performance
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Dual-task performance is often explained by bottleneck models, suggesting a single processing stage limits capacity.
  • The psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm reveals processing delays when tasks overlap.
  • Existing models struggle to fully account for all observed PRP effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and detail the central capacity sharing (CCS) model.
  • To derive equations explaining CCS model behavior in dual-task scenarios.
  • To contrast CCS model predictions with the central bottleneck model.

Main Methods:

  • Developing the central capacity sharing (CCS) model.
  • Deriving mathematical equations for CCS model predictions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing CCS predictions against established psychological refractory period (PRP) effects.

    • Main Results:

    • The CCS model accurately predicts key PRP effects, including specific slopes and additivity patterns.
    • It accounts for the underadditivity of Task 2 manipulations and additivity with SOA.
    • The model also predicts the carry-forward of Task 1 manipulations and increased Task 1 response times with decreasing SOA.

    Conclusions:

    • The central capacity sharing (CCS) model successfully explains a wide range of dual-task phenomena.
    • It provides a robust alternative to the central bottleneck model.
    • CCS offers a new framework for understanding cognitive capacity limitations.