Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 20, 2025

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Neural Correlates of Emotion Regulation
Published on: August 26, 2011
Are aggressive people able to integrate mitigating information into their hostile intent attribution? An ERP study
Jean Gagnon1, Raphaëlle Fortin1, Catherine Samuel2
1Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Canada; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, Canada; Laboratoire d'électrophysiologie en Neuroscience sociale (LENS), University of Montreal, Canada.
Aggressive individuals impulsively judge intentions, not due to lack of information, but incomplete processing of cues. Non-aggressive individuals better integrate contextual information to reduce hostile intent attribution.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Forensic Psychology
Background:
- Contradictory findings exist regarding aggressive individuals' difficulties in reappraising hostile intent.
- Aggressive individuals may impulsively disregard nonhostile cues or fail to integrate them.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate neural activity during intention attribution in aggressive and nonaggressive individuals.
- To examine how conflicting social cues are processed and integrated.
- To test the hypothesis that aggressive individuals overestimate behavioral cues due to poor integration of contextual information.
Main Methods:
- Developed an event-related brain potential (ERP) protocol based on cue integration models.
- Tracked neural activity in response to violations of expectations about hostile vs. nonhostile intentions.
- Compared neural responses in aggressive (including incarcerated) and nonaggressive women.
Main Results:
- Aggressive individuals exhibit impulsivity in judging others' intentions.
- This impulsivity stems from incomplete inferential processing of conflicting cues, not from avoiding mitigating information.
- Nonaggressive individuals prioritize contextual cues to moderate hostile attributions.
Conclusions:
- Aggressive individuals' difficulties lie in completing the inferential process of integrating conflicting social cues.
- Nonaggressive individuals demonstrate a greater ability to use context to temper judgments of hostile intent.
- Findings contribute to understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying aggressive behavior and intent attribution.
More Related Videos
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Aggression
Attribution Theory
Fundamental Attribution Error
Robbers Cave
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
Stereotype Content Model