Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Rethinking the focusing effect in decision-making.

Paolo Cherubini1, Ketti Mazzocco, Rino Rumiati

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Milano, Bicocca, Piazza Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy. paolo.cherubini@unimib.it

Acta Psychologica
|April 8, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microbial biostimulant reshapes carbon and nitrogen metabolism in olive trees: dendrochronological insights into enhanced growth and climate adaptation.

Frontiers in plant science·2026
Same author

Rethinking health priorities for displaced populations through the integration of epigenetics and iterative reasoning.

Public health reviews·2026
Same author

Adaptive yet suboptimal integration of advice in decision-making.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

In Silico Psycho-Oncology: Understanding Resilience Pathways in Breast Cancer-Determinants of Longitudinal Depression and Quality-of-Life Trajectories.

Journal of personalized medicine·2026
Same author

Cognitive biases and collapse of prioritization accuracy under incongruent clinical data: a mixed-methods study of nursing diagnostic reasoning.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of a Quality of Life Predictor to Guide Psychosocial Support in Breast Cancer.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Exploring the interactions between external support, internal psychological factors, and digital teaching competence: Evidence from a PLS-SEM model in Chinese rural teachers.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Heterogeneity in moderation effects: How willingness-to-pay shapes the knowledge-behavior relationship in sustainable fashion consumption.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Impact of early environmental unpredictability on impulsive consumption: Insights from life history theory.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Pre-service foreign language teachers' acceptance of ChatGPT in microteaching lesson planning: A sequential mixed-methods study.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

AI-driven adaptive feedback and EFL writing performance: The roles of engagement, metacognition, and epistemic agency in a cross-linguistic context.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Crawling into a hole: Attachment insecurity, shame, and hikikomori symptoms in an adolescent population.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

People do not always rely on explicitly stated choices. This study shows that relevant alternatives are considered, even if not verbally formulated in decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • The focusing effect suggests individuals only consider explicitly stated alternatives in decision-making.
  • Legrenzi et al. (1993) proposed that explicit verbal formulation determines alternative representation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether explicit verbal formulation is necessary or sufficient for focusing on decision alternatives.
  • To explore the role of relevance in representing alternatives beyond explicit mentions.

Main Methods:

  • Replication of Legrenzi et al.'s original experiment.
  • Three experiments designed to test the sufficiency and necessity of explicit verbal formulation.
  • Analysis of alternative relevance in decision-making contexts.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Explicit verbal mention of an alternative is neither sufficient nor necessary for focusing on it.
  • Individuals can consider relevant alternatives even when not explicitly stated.
  • The study challenges the strict interpretation of the focusing effect.

Conclusions:

  • Decision-making involves considering relevant alternatives beyond explicit verbal cues.
  • Relevance, not just explicit formulation, drives the representation of alternatives.
  • Findings refine understanding of the focusing effect in choice situations.