Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Appendectomy--classical or laparoscopic?].

O Polanecký1, P Libánský, M Smejkal

  • 1III. chirurgická klinika 1. LF UK a FN Motol.

Rozhledy V Chirurgii : Mesicnik Ceskoslovenske Chirurgicke Spolecnosti
|April 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preoperative parathyroid hormone level as a predictor of parathyroid adenoma size in surgically treated patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2026
Same author

Recurrent Primary Hyperparathyroidism in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 Syndrome.

Physiological research·2023
Same author

Surgical treatment of hyperparathyroidism with a pathologically changed parathyroid gland found in the mediastinum.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2023
Same author

Concomitant thyroid disease in patients operated for primary hyperparathyroidism.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2021
Same author

Retrosternal goiter.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2021
Same author

History of thyroid surgery.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2021
Same journal

Rare causes of pneumoperitoneum.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2026
Same journal

Imaging of pneumoperitoneum.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2026
Same journal

Postoperative pneumoperitoneum.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2026
Same journal

Pneumoperitoneum of the lower gastrointestinal tract.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2026
Same journal

Pneumoperitoneum in dis-eases and traumas of the upper part of the digestive tract -  an overview of current knowledge and clinical context.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2026
Same journal

Pseudoaneurysm arteria carotis.

Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti·2026
See all related articles

This study compared open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in 219 patients. Researchers found no significant advantages for the laparoscopic approach regarding pain management, hospital stay, or respiratory function.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical techniques
  • Gastrointestinal surgery
  • Patient outcomes

Background:

  • Appendectomy is a common surgical procedure.
  • Both open and laparoscopic techniques are widely used for appendectomy.
  • Comparative studies are essential to determine optimal surgical approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy.
  • To evaluate differences in analgesic use, hospital stay, and pulmonary function.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 219 patients who underwent appendectomy within the last two years.
  • Comparison of patients based on surgical technique: open or laparoscopic.
  • Assessment of postoperative analgesic consumption, length of hospital stay, and pre- and post-operative spirometry measurements.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were found in the usage of analgesics between the two groups.
  • The length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between open and laparoscopic appendectomy.
  • Spirometry results showed no clear advantage for either surgical technique.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic appendectomy did not demonstrate clear superiority over open appendectomy based on the evaluated parameters.
  • Further research may be needed to identify specific patient populations or outcomes where laparoscopic appendectomy offers advantages.