Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The archaeal cell cycle: current issues.

Rolf Bernander1

  • 1Department of Molecular Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Center, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18C, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. Rolf.Berander@ebc.uu.se

Molecular Microbiology
|April 16, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

BarR, an Lrp-type transcription factor in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, regulates an aminotransferase gene in a β-alanine responsive manner.

Molecular microbiology·2014
Same author

Chromosome replication origins: do we really need them?

BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology·2014
Same author

Structure of crenactin, an archaeal actin homologue active at 90°C.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography·2014
Same author

Archaeal signal transduction: impact of protein phosphatase deletions on cell size, motility, and energy metabolism in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2013
Same author

Mapping of active replication origins in vivo in thaum- and euryarchaeal replicons.

Molecular microbiology·2013
Same author

The cell cycle of archaea.

Nature reviews. Microbiology·2013
Same journal

Riboflavin Salvage Supports Glycolysis in Borrelia burgdorferi Through Flavin-Dependent NAD<sup>+</sup> Regeneration.

Molecular microbiology·2026
Same journal

Distinct Spatial Organisation of Rho and RNA Polymerase in Salmonella Cells.

Molecular microbiology·2026
Same journal

A Single-Nucleotide Substitution Generates a de Novo Promoter That Activates a Latent Metabolic Bypass in Escherichia coli.

Molecular microbiology·2026
Same journal

A Phosphorylation-Dependent Partner-Switching-Like Module Regulates a Glycosyltransferase Required for Heterocyst Polysaccharide Layer Formation in Anabaena sp. Strain PCC 7120.

Molecular microbiology·2026
Same journal

Chain-Length Regulation by WzzE Is Necessary for, but Genetically Separable From, Cyclic Enterobacterial Common Antigen Synthesis.

Molecular microbiology·2026
Same journal

To Move or Not to Move: When and How Bacteria Suppress Flagellar Motility.

Molecular microbiology·2026
See all related articles

Structural similarities between archaeal and bacterial replication initiators offer insights into cell cycle regulation. This research advances understanding of archaeal and eukaryotic DNA replication, genome segregation, and cell division.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Structural similarities exist between archaeal Orc1/Cdc6 and bacterial DnaA initiator proteins.
  • Proteins influencing archaeal chromatin structure, genome segregation, and cell division are being identified.
  • Bacterial cell division proteins (MinD, FtsZ) and cytoskeletal elements are also found in archaea.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the implications of structural similarities between Orc1/Cdc6 and DnaA for cell cycle regulation.
  • To integrate findings on replication origins with protein roles in chromatin structure and genome segregation.
  • To provide fundamental insights into replication control and cell division in archaea and eukaryotes.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of structural similarities between initiator proteins.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of recent findings on archaeal proteins involved in chromatin structure and genome segregation.
  • Integration of bacterial cell division protein data with archaeal homologs.
  • Consideration of cell cycle issues in the novel Nanoarchaeota phylum.

    • Main Results:

    • Structural similarities between Orc1/Cdc6 and DnaA suggest conserved mechanisms in DNA replication initiation.
    • Identification of key proteins (Sph1, 2, ScpA, B, Sir2, Alba, Rio1p) impacting archaeal chromatin and segregation.
    • Insights into conserved bacterial cell division proteins (MinD, FtsZ) applicable to archaea.
    • Emerging cell cycle complexities highlighted by the Nanoarchaeota phylum.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides fundamental insights into replication control and cell division across archaea and eukaryotes.
    • Future research directions include chromosome replication termination, in situ cytological studies, and regulatory roles of GTP-binding proteins and small RNAs.