Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Unraveling Entropic Rate Acceleration Induced by Solvent Dynamics in Membrane Enzymes
Published on: January 16, 2016
Solvation parameters for predicting the structure of surface loops in proteins: transferability and entropic effects
Bedamati Das1, Hagai Meirovitch
1Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics and Department of Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Abstract:
A new procedure for optimizing parameters of implicit solvation models introduced by us has been applied successfully first to cyclic peptides and more recently to three surface loops of ribonuclease A (Das and Meirovitch, Proteins 2001;43:303-314) using the simplified model E(tot) = E(FF)(epsilon = nr) + Sigma(i) sigma(i)A(i), where sigma(i) are atomic solvation parameters (ASPs) to be optimized, A(i) is the solvent accessible surface area of atom i, E(FF)(epsilon = nr) is the AMBER force-field energy of the loop-loop and loop-template interactions with a distance-dependent dielectric constant, epsilon = nr, where n is a parameter. The loop is free to move while the protein template is held fixed in its X-ray structure; an extensive conformational search for energy minimized loop structures is carried out with our local torsional deformation method. The optimal ASPs and n are those for which the structure with the lowest minimized energy [E(tot)(n,sigma(i))] becomes the experimental X-ray structure, or less strictly, the energy gap between these structures is within 2-3 kcal/mol. To check if a set of ASPs can be defined, which is transferable to a large number of loops, we optimize individual sets of ASPs (based on n = 2) for 12 surface loops from which an "averaged" best-fit set is defined. This set is then applied to the 12 loops and an independent "test" group of 8 loops leading in most cases to very small RMSD values; thus, this set can be useful for structure prediction of loops in homology modeling. For three loops we also calculate the free energy gaps to find that they are only slightly smaller than their energy counterparts, indicating that only larger n will enable reducing too large gaps. Because of its simplicity, this model allowed carrying out an extensive application of our methodology, providing thereby a large number of benchmark results for comparison with future calculations based on n > 2 as well as on more sophisticated solvation models with as yet unknown performance for loops.
Related Concept Videos
Entropy and Solvation
Solvating Effects
Solubility
A solution is a homogeneous mixture composed of a solvent, the major component, and a solute, the minor component. The physical state of a solution—solid, liquid, or gas—is typically the same as that of the solvent. Solute concentrations are often described with qualitative terms such as dilute (of relatively low concentration) and concentrated (of relatively high concentration).
In a solution, the solute particles (molecules, atoms, and/or ions)...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...

